User talk:Giga Soul 999

June 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Light Yagami, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Xfansd. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Giga Soul 999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

that the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I'm blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query Me!} 04:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Giga Soul 999 (talk) 01:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that I've been blocked for vandalism that I was doing on L Lawliet article page. I won't do that again.

  I have helped to fix typos on other articles on Wikipedia like National People's Congress and I'd do it if I'm unblocked. 
  I'm not going to do vandalism again.  Giga Soul 999 (talk) 19:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]