User talk:Gibari Sultan

Welcome!

Hi Gibari Sultan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Cerebellum (talk) 12:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

.

Khan of Agror moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Khan of Agror, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khan of Agror moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Khan of Agror. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and better support the contents. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Sultan Awais Swati

added links pointing to Dir and Swat

Sultan Pakhal Swati

added a link pointing to Swat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

If you ever make personal remarks like this[1] again, you will surely be get reported and blocked.Sutyarashi (talk) 11:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what's your problem , Why you removing Shah miris from Pakhal sarkar ,I told you to read Syed Hamdani books. If you don't believe in books then goto Srinagar India and talk to your fellow Shahmri Indians they will confirm you , your identity if you can't do this then I can give you their contacts If you can't do this too then please stop threating somebody on the name of so called Warning Gibari Sultan (talk) 13:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Iguess Gibari Sultan did the correct thing.... Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He is reporting me now On the charges of adding Shahmiris in Pakhal Sarkar article , now he suspecting me on removing the comments added by another user claiming on Swatis Pashtun orgin which were on your talk page. This user Sutyarashi added this thing too on my investigation page Gibari Sultan (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Azmarai76 Where? He might have done right thing on your talk page, but unfortunately it was one of his sockaccount. See here[2]

Sutyarashi (talk) 15:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gibari Sultan. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 08:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock| Username : Gibari Sultan

Dear Wikipedia Team,

I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block on my Wikipedia account and offer my sincere apologies for any unintended violation of guidelines. I also want to assure you that I will adhere strictly to the policies and regulations in the future.

I have always been passionate about contributing to the pages related to Swati history, given my personal connection as a member of the Chief of Swati family. As a Swati historian, I have made it a point to add valuable information to these pages, citing references from reputable books to ensure accuracy.

To my dismay, my account was blocked based on charges that I believe were mistakenly attributed to my contributions. Additionally, I have noticed that some individuals have taken advantage of my absence and deleted the articles I worked diligently to create. These articles contained precious information that holds great significance to the Swati tribe's history.

I kindly request your assistance in unblocking my account and restoring the articles that were deleted. I deeply regret any unintended violation and assure you that I have learned from this experience. Going forward, I will be more cautious, ensuring strict compliance with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies.

I greatly value the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of sharing knowledge with the world. I am committed to upholding the platform's integrity and standards, while also preserving and promoting the history of the Swati tribe.

Thank you for considering my appeal. I appreciate your understanding and support in rectifying this situation. I am available to provide any further information or clarification you may require.

Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience caused and assure you of my commitment to responsible and valuable contributions to Wikipedia.

Yours sincerely }} Gibari Sultan (talk) 23:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arghushals

Hello, Gibari Sultan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arghushals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gibari Sultan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Team, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block on my Wikipedia account and offer my sincere apologies for any unintended violation of guidelines. I also want to assure you that I will adhere strictly to the policies and regulations in the future. I have always been passionate about contributing to the pages related to Swati history, given my personal connection as a member of the Chief of Swati family. As a Swati historian, I have made it a point to add valuable information to these pages, citing references from reputable books to ensure accuracy. To my dismay, my account was blocked based on charges that I believe were mistakenly attributed to my contributions. Additionally, I have noticed that some individuals have taken advantage of my absence and deleted the articles I worked diligently to create. These articles contained precious information that holds great significance to the Swati tribe's history. I would like to address specific concerns related to the baseless edits made by the user sutyarashi. This user has been consistently vandalizing the content on articles related to the Swati Tribe. Among the edits made, they deleted all the articles and left only the main article of Swati's history. Furthermore, they introduced a completely unfounded claim of Dardic origin for the Swati tribe. It is important to note that this claim has no basis in any credible sources or scholarly works. A thorough search through books and articles available on Google will reveal that there is no mention of Swatis being of Dardic origin. These edits made by sutyarashi not only demonstrate a clear bias and animosity towards the Swati tribe but also serve to make their history appear suspicious. As contributors, our aim should be to provide accurate and well-supported information, rather than introducing our own unfounded claims or personal biases. I strongly believe that the Swati page should be revised to reflect accurate historical information, supported by reputable sources. Regarding my own contributions, I would like to provide some additional context. Initially, when I started contributing to the Swati page, I included references to Pashtun culture, influenced by the stories I had heard in my home. However, upon further study and consultation with scholarly works, I discovered that the Swatis were actually Persian-speaking Tajiks. In order to accommodate the various claims made by both Pashtun and Tajik communities, I revised the origin to Indo-Aryan, which encompasses both groups. It is crucial to emphasize that the claim of Dardic origin is completely illogical and false. Therefore, I kindly request your assistance in unblocking my account so that I may continue contributing to Swati history using proper citations and reliable sources. If unblocking is not possible at this time, I would like to request that the Swati page be locked to prevent further baseless edits by sutyarashi, and that the edits made by this user be reverted. I also urge the Wikipedia admins to take appropriate action against sutyarashi for repeatedly vandalizing pages. I deeply regret any inconvenience caused and assure you of my commitment to responsible and well-referenced contributions to Wikipedia. I greatly appreciate your attention to this matter and I am available to provide any further information or clarification you may require. Thank you for your understanding and support

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. This excessively long unblock request does not address this. Yamla (talk) 00:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deletion discussion about Jahangiri Swati

Hello, Gibari Sultan, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jahangiri Swati, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahangiri Swati.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Arghushal Swati

Hello, Gibari Sultan, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arghushal Swati, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arghushal Swati.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Khan of Agror

Hello, Gibari Sultan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khan of Agror, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Khan of Agror

Hello, Gibari Sultan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khan of Agror".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khankhel Swati for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khankhel Swati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khankhel Swati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]