Jump to content

User talk:Giantnut76

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Giantnut76! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 06:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Why can't I edit the subsection In Mathematics"?Giantnut76 (talk) 03:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC) {{helpme}}[reply]

Hi Giantnut76. You're going to have to be much more specific in order for anyone to be able to answer such a question. In the article on Mathematics, what were you trying to add, to where exactly (what do you mean by "subsection")? What did you do, and what happened when you tried it? Repost the help me template when you've expanded your question with these details. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing

[edit]

Most, if not all, of your edits to articles have been unhelpful. Several of them have simply been mathematically incorrect, some of them have been incomprehensible, at least one of them has messed up formatting of an article, and your edit to Template:X1 looked rather like vandalism: if it wasn't, then it is very unclear what it was supposed to achieve. You are, of course, very welcome to contribute to the encyclopaedia, but please be very careful, and i strongly advise you to keep away from editing mathematical articles, as your grasp of mathematics does not seem to be up to the task. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2147483659 (number). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selected numbers:10000 to 100000 (September 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Giantnut76, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Giantnut76/Selected numbers:10000 to 100000, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kinds of abundant numbers has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kinds of abundant numbers. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kinds of abundant numbers (September 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kinds of abundant numbers has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kinds of abundant numbers. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kinds of abundant numbers (September 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abundant number Properties (October 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 03:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

⟨⟩

User page Giantnut76 (talk) 01:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on unconstructive editing

[edit]

I'm afraid what I wrote to you in August is still true: most, if not all, of your edits to articles have been unhelpful. Your edit to 1001 (number), for example, was totally unhelpful: nobody reading an article needs to be confronted with that sort of information. Some of your edits appear to be deliberate vandalism, rather than good-faith but unhelpful editing: for example, it is difficult to see your edit at "Afghanistan Analysts Network" as anything other than vandalism. Also, most of your edits out of article space look like playing around, and a few of them appear to be vandalism. If you carry on in the same way, you are likely to be blocked from editing, because you are taking up time of other editors who have to clean up after you, and their time could be more usefully spent on other work. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of abundant numbers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Giantnut76. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "500000 (number)".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Giantnut76. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of abundant numbers".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]