User talk:Ghlagatin

Welcome!

Hello, Ghlagatin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ghlagatin/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ghlagatin/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 10:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ghlagatin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 10:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ghlagatin/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ghlagatin/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please do not resubmit without considerable improvements.

Hitro talk 10:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghlagatin (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ghlagatin/sandbox/Ghlagatin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ghlagatin/sandbox/Ghlagatin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:28, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ghlagatin

A tag has been placed on User:Ghlagatin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ghlagatin/sandbox/Ghlagatin

A tag has been placed on User:Ghlagatin/sandbox/Ghlagatin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Minorax (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ghlagatin/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Ghlagatin/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Minorax (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61089

is closed. Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You say someone used your phone to create accounts and articles? Trouble is, all the articles I see are about you. Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noting Ghlagatintv (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log),

Ghlagati20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log),

Solomontim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log).

Blocked. Deleted contribs about Draft:Ghlagatin and related subjects. Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra Yeah.. Am not aware of the multiple accounts...

because i told my colleague to help me create Wikipedia page.

please kindly forgive me.... Deleted the multiple accounts

thank you Ghlagatin (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your colleague would be Solomontim? Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra Yes please... How did you know Ghlagatin (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Buh please am begging you.

Give me another chance to create Wikipedia page about Ghlagatin.

Please you can disable all the accounts my colleague created

thank you Ghlagatin (talk) 21:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

😊 Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra please kindly unblock my page, so that can start writing article.

please I promise it won't happen again Ghlagatin (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will not be unblocked to write about Ghlagatin or Ghlagatintv, or any subject connected to you. Please follow the instruction in the UTRS decline. Please explain why you claim someone else used your phone when all these sock puppets wrote about you. Thanks. Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra Please am the Ghlagatin.. And I am a blogger...

I ask a friend of mine to help me create Wikipedia article page Ghlagatin (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra:, I admire your willingness to engage here, but I think it's time to remove tpa. This editor is intent on continuing to misuse Wikipedia to promote themselves. There is no way WP:N can be met; it's a complete non-starter.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:17, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm done. They can follow instructions. I'll leave talk page 'cause I want them to request unblocking here and not back at UTRS. Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to fire up your ping mute device!-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra Okay Thank you soo much Ghlagatin (talk) 21:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please I hope you will disable all the accounts my colleague created. Ghlagatin (talk) 21:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo Okay.. buh please kindly unblock my account Ghlagatin (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is not going to be unblocked. Wikipedia is not a platform to promote yourself - there are myriad other websites where you can uplaod your profile this is not one of them.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo Okay Ghlagatin (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enough! Follow instructions, or I will remove your ability to edit your talk page. Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]