User talk:Ghaib

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vesselcd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vesselcd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:2dayordie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2dayordie.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Viridian Sun

A tag has been placed on Viridian Sun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Viridian Sun

Hi there Ghaib! I saw that you added a {{hangon}} tag to a page which you created, Viridian Sun. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD A9. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Viridian Sun, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ghaib! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Vessel (artist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Atlas Plug

The article Atlas Plug has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vessel (artist)

The article Vessel (artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. I can find no independent coverage of this artist or his albums. The claim that he "has been critically acclaimed" is unsupported.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 04:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of OmTheory

The article OmTheory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches for both his real and stage name reveal nothing in the way of independent, reliable, in-depth and meaningful coverage of him or his work. Appears to fail notability standards for musicians. The "biggest" source I can find is a BBC entry that is equivalent to a Bloomberg, Yellow Pages or database entry and offers no discussion of his work (link).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 22:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]