User talk:Getabrainmorans
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Getabrainmorans. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. isento (talk) 12:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Getabrainmorans! I need to talk to you about your recent edit summary use - specifically, the edit summaries below:
- 12 May 2021:
"oxbridge dumbasses can't even quote people properly"
- 12 May 2021:
"wikipedia dumbasses can't even link things properly"
- 13 May 2021:
"i know you've based your entire wikipedia career around sucking this guy's cock like an industrial pressure pump ..."
These edit summaries are not appropriate nor are they acceptable. It is not okay to make personal attacks like that in your edit summaries. Instead, they should be appropriate, civil, descriptive, and summarize the changes that you've made to the page you're saving. Please do not add any more edit summaries like this. It is against policy, and can lead to administrative action if it continues - something I really don't want to have to do. Please keep your edit summaries appropriate for me, okay? :-) If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. Thanks! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit]- Adding
{{unblock-un|your new username here}}
below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page. - At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
- Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.
- Adding
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below this notice. Guettarda (talk) 17:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Talk page access
[edit]Hi. Your last edit to your talk page was highly inappropriate. I removed your access. To appeal your block, you can see WP:APPEAL. Killiondude (talk) 02:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)