User talk:Georgewilliamherbert/Archive2007-07

Wikipedia content for children, and olpc

I'm glad you had a chance to hear mary lou speak; she's something else. I'd love to talk about this more -- we should create a wikiproject for it. Are you ever on IRC? I'll be online and meeting about just this tomorrow b/t 1200 and 1600 EST.

Also, the OLPC-related articles on here are a total mess. Please see Talk:XO-1_(laptop)#Requested_move_and_split and lend a hand if you can; I'd rather not hack at the article myself.

Until soon, +sj + 00:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps something like Wikipedia:WikiProject OEPC for the one encyclopedia per child project? Something that should be related to the WP:1.0 efforts (they would like to be involved as well). +sj + 02:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

To Georgewilliamherbert ((Unblock))

What do you want me to do to prove my SABR identity and to more along the "reinstatement" process. See my talk page. --199.219.151.206 17:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC) (Ron Liebman)[reply]

I believe he is also discussing the matter with Baseball Bugs. Perhaps you should contact him, Mr. Herbert, to acquire additional information on this matter. Thank you for your time. :) -Ebyabe 18:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A36 steel

My source is my own practice. A36 is used for rolled shapes other than wide-flange shapes -- angles and channels being the most common. A992 (a 50 ksi steel) is the preferred steel for wide-flange shapes which make up the vast majority of steel in most structures. Most plate is A36 or A572 Grade 50.

Take a look at AISC's steel availability site, and this 2003 article from Modern Steel Construction. MARussellPESE 03:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ron liebman

I've posted a thread at the admin noticeboard regarding his currently outstanding unblock request, since it seems discussion may have stalled. Looks like you've had some involvement in this, so I thought I should let you know. Feel free to comment. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BWB-Composite.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BWB-Composite.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -N 22:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I think perhaps both. :-) Cheers, Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 03:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

--AFUSCO has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--AFUSCO 01:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

big page

you should consider archiving this long talk page--AFUSCO 01:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cover art, and Template:album cover fur

There is in fact a widespread "using image for identification is OK" cnsensus. Please don't be damaging templates in this manner. Georgewilliamherbert 20:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no discussion to support that. Asserting that there is consensus does not make it so. --bainer (talk) 02:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Moog

Morning

I'm just writing to ask how my comment stating that there are in fact previous members of the "lo fi band" Additional Moog classes as vandalism?? There are ex members, surely the entry is incomplete if it excludes this fact?

Thanks

Vacuum energy, fluctuations in the quantum vacuum, electromagnetic quantum vacuum, ZPE fluctuations/sea of energy, ... a.k.a. 'Aether'

Dear Administrator: related to your edition [1] and to your comment [2] alleging WP:RS, please allow to indicate the Wikilink to my shared answer: [3]. In order to complement the answer please allow also to present a few words, from an aerospace engineer; words which very well convey my lay perception on this subject:

"The concept of the aether has returned in the form of the dynamic fluctuating vacuum energy that fills so-called empty space everywhere in the universe. The physics of the vacuum is shaping up as a major theme of frontier science in the 21st century." in [4]

Thank you for the attention that you have devoted to my editions.

P.S.: It was nice read at your user page, only afterwards, that you work in the aerospace engineering; i am a systems admin, not a physicist, but coincidently my brother works in the [British] aerospace engineering too. See you :-)

Info

Thanks for the info. I'll be more careful next time. Izzy007 00:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indef blocks

Thanks - I've tweaked those two to a month each while I look at them again. ELIMINATORJR ^TALK 03:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

In that case, does test5 still work? bibliomaniac 15 03:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closure

Pascal an admin? No. So you just closed a debate controversially that you participated in, and that after calling me insane. Doesnt look good, SqueakBox 20:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]