User talk:Georgeslegloupier

Welcome!

Hello, Georgeslegloupier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Eliezer 04:20, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WorkChoice

I'd suggest "WorkChoice macht frei", but that would be bad of me. ;-)

Ben Aveling 08:31, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I worked out what you are referring to, riské (I found out about reductio ad Hitlerum recently) but it was still clever. Georgeslegloupier 03:04, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hicks

Yeah, I wasn't surprised.

I'm torn between suspecting that David Hick's is more mad than bad, and being very suspicious of the treatment he's receiving.

In one sense, what happens to him isn't important, he's just one person, and probably not a very good one at that. On the other hand, the rules that apply to him are the same rules that apply to us all - so there is an element of precedence about this, as well as symbolic significance, that makes him worth fighting for.

A conservative is a liberal who has just been mugged.

A liberal is a conservate who has just been arrested.

Thanks for the message.

I appreciate it.

Ben Aveling 07:22, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2006 FIFA World Cup controversies

Hi Georgeslegloupier! Thanks for your recent interest in the AfD of the 2006 World Cup controversies article. Your input is most appreciated. Since the AfD is now closed and the World Cup almost over, I'd like to encourage you to put some input into the improvement of this article, either by improving where you think you can, or by suggesting changes on the talk page. Kind regards, MyNam e IsNotBob 03:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]