User talk:Georgeeby

Welcome!

Hello, Georgeeby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Femto 13:00, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in User:Georgeeby

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User:Georgeeby, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User:Georgeeby is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User:Georgeeby, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navicular disease

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Navicular disease. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Your edits are not only promoting a fringe theory but also constitute a clear violation of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies, as you are inserting a self-published source written by yourself, as evidenced here, and which is attempting to sell a product here. This is also clearly a copy and paste as shown here Montanabw^(talk) 23:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Your recent editing history at Navicular Disease shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Navicular Disease has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Depression

Hi George. I am so sorry to have done that to your Management of depression edits. I know how frustrating it can be to have detailed work deleted.

Acupuncture

As I said in my edit summary, it is just too early for us to include the results of that study. We will have to wait until it has been subjected to independent appraisal and contextualised in a scholarly systematic review. It is a fairly bright line rule here that we don't use "primary" sources to modify or challenge the findings of strong "secondary" sources. The relevant guideline is WP:MEDRS.

Magnesium

Your summary of the systematic review looks sound, but it goes into too much detail for that overview article. Please consider creating Magnesium and depression or Depression and magnesium or similar (by clicking on one of those red links), and pointing readers of Management of depression#Magnesium to your more detailed summary by adding {{main|Magnesium and depression}} or {{main|Depression and magnesium}} under the section heading.

Regards
Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 02:04, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about MEDRS + potential conflict of interest

1. Medical content on Wikipedia needs to be supported by reliable secondary and tertiary sources, please see WP:MEDRS. 2. I noted that your Wikipedia user name is the same as one of the author names of the sources you are adding. Please see WP:Conflicts of interest (medicine), thank you. Lesion (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]