User talk:Genuine23446

December 2024

Hello, I'm CipherRephic. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nuatali Nelmes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CR (talk) 12:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content is defamatory and incorrect Genuine23446 (talk) 12:54, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Nuatali Nelmes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 12:54, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genuine23446, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Wildhorse13992 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 12:56, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect - this is my only account Genuine23446 (talk) 13:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you were responding to warnings on another editor's talk page? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nuatali Nelmes. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 12:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Genuine23446 reported by User:TLJ7863 (Result: ). Thank you. TLJ7863 (talk) 13:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]