User talk:GenGen100

Welcome StebbinsMan!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 39,892,538 registered editors!

Hello StebbinsMan. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost   Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 15:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

• Español
• Deutsch
• Français
• Italiano
• עברית
• Русский
• 日本語
• Polski
• فارسی

Reverted

Hi there! I recently reverted your edit on Nick Land. Describing an individual as a "neo-Nazi" requires strong references, which we do not have in that article for that descriptor. If you find citations supporting that descriptor, please feel free to add it back. Jlevi (talk) 21:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Well, I certainly haven't seen any proper third party encyclopedic evidence of him being a "philosopher" when his main schtick is being a reactionary fascist that classically misinterprets actual philosophers like Nietzsche and Crowley to fit their delusions of grandeur. Perhaps "scientific racist" or "eugenicist" would meet the current citations more semantically properly. StebbinsMan (talk) 23:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

User:Jlevi

Just saw this--don't think I got a ping. If you'd like to discuss this further, I suggest moving the conversation to the article talk page rather than your own. Jlevi (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Synchronicity

The source (The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience) states that Synchronicity fits into definition of pseudoscience. However You have changed this sentence and now it's not exactly what the reference points to. I have questions: Do You think: it's not a credible source? idea of synchronicity is scientific? 37.47.88.145 (talk) 23:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

I think it's philosophical and doesn't have much to do with science or pseudoscience. Although, I suppose it could fall under science or pseudoscience if it's tested properly and found to apply or not apply in certain situations. StebbinsMan (talk) 02:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Energy (esotericism). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Re: [1], Goop is not a reliable source for anything except claims about Goop itself. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Guy Macon Exactly. StebbinsMan (talk) 18:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)