User talk:Gen. Quon/Archive 3

The Office

199 amazing episodes done. Two left to go! These last few full-hours have been really great! (Andy kinda ruined "A.A.R.M.", but beyond that!) It's gonna be sad to see it leave. :( Are you gonna work on making previous seasons be good articles? -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 02:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I've been extremely busy lately though, which is why my work on the finale page has been very little haha. My only hope is to bring up Niagara, and other big episodes like it to good articles. If I were you, I'd definitely go with season seven btw. But it's up to you! -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Awesome! That'd be great if we could do that. By the way, great job on all you've done on The X Files! What do you think we should do for the character pages? Their kind of a huge mess, so it would definitely be difficult. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 00:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Great! I'd prefer to work on Jim's page, but beyond that you can get first pick. And you're right. The only above-average character pages are Michael and Dwight, and even then it's sad. Hopefully we can get them to a good state. How many of the main characters do you want to work on? Should we include Andy or Ryan or any of the others? -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 02:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Awesome, I'd like that idea! You can pick for Michael and Dwight, since I chose Jim already. But how 'bout that finale? -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 02:38, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Sorry, jumping in here. Firstly, great job to both of you with the episode articles! I can't believe the series is finally ending... I like the idea of improving the character articles, and have been wanting to improve Karen Filippelli's article for a while (it's a mess). Thoughts on collaborating to bring as many as possible up to snuff? Ruby 2010/2013 02:47, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Eat It - Comp Weird Al.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Eat It - Comp Weird Al.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Best of Yankovic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Best of Yankovic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Official Music Weird Al.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Official Music Weird Al.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:Another One Rides the Bus (EP)/GA1.
Message added 17:54, 18 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 — Statυs (talk, contribs) 17:54, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: The Office Stuff

I honestly loved it, one of the best series finales ever. I feel like this show is gonna be remembered like M*A*S*H or Cheers in the future. But, awesome! I never noticed that "Stairmageddon" was ready for revisions, sorry! -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 02:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts

I completely agree. I just thought I'd come and inform you though that with my schedule this summer, I won't be able to do much with the character pages. I can still work on the episodes, but I'm not too sure if I'll have the time to help beyond that. Just thought I'd give you a heads up! -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Awesome, all right. Sounds good. -- NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

CN has the title as the party's over etc

check out the full schedule and go to monday http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/schedule/index.html http://gyazo.com/c3bd74b5e80727c2ed38f206b8f9af17.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.125.67.234 (talk) 14:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply

Ok i just think its kind of odd since they just got rid of the title screen in favor of the logo on articles like Regular Show and Ben 10: Omniverse and almost every other show. Koala15 (talk) 00:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

AT episode list GAN

Hey, I saw you nominate List of Adventure Time episodes for good article stats, but I have some concern. The good article criteria state that stand-alone lists cannot be good articles and instead should be nominated for featured lists. Doesn't that article count as a stand-alone list? Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 00:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Oops! You're right. Unfortunately, I already have a FL pending, so I removed it.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

List of Regular Show episodes – FL

Responded to your comments over at the List of Regular Show episodes FL page – removed the season navigator entirely per comments by The Rambling Man, and can't find any more errors in the references section. Thanks for the (leading) support, and your comments are appreciated. Holiday56 (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

X Cops

Terribly sorry about that one! I completely forgot. I will make a start immediately and hopefully finish in a couple of days. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

A-class review and projects

I've left comments at Wikipedia:WikiProject The X-Files A-Class review/Millennium (The X-Files)/archive1. It's the only episode on there that I have seen. I also didn't know if you were still interested in working on Buffy, since I got burnt out on Doctor Who and don't have much else to work on. I have started working on the reception of season 1 articles again. Anyways, happy summer! Glimmer721 ^talk 18:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 01:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

FLC request

Hi, since you are a regular at FLC. I'm here to ask for your input at my FL candidate: Mayor of Pichilemu, I'd be thankful if you comment there. Thanks in advance, Lester Foster (talk | talk) 08:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

I'll try to look at it in a bit!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:MulderScullyBlackMillennium.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:MulderScullyBlackMillennium.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Facelessrebel.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Facelessrebel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Colonist (The X-Files), may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Guardian list

Have you seen this? It's kind of an obscure list because it leaves off Darin Morgan, but I suppose it could be useful. Glimmer721 ^talk 00:20, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Food Album

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article The Food Album you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Food Album

The article The Food Album you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Food Album for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: FAN Request

I'll do my best to provide comments. I'm pretty busy in real life and so my time for non-arbitrator duties is restricted; if I haven't gotten around to it by the end of this weekend start harassing me so I don't forget. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 18:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Food Album

The article The Food Album you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Food Album for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Simon & Marcy

it looks like it could be a GA. it would be great if you nominated it. Just a friendly suggestion.Lucia Black (talk) 03:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

I went ahead and nom'd both "SaM" and "I Remember You". I think they both have legs. We'll see. Thanks for the suggestion!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The 8th Horcrux for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The 8th Horcrux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 8th Horcrux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I am One of Many (talk) 04:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK RfC

• As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions02:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of It Came from the Nightosphere

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article It Came from the Nightosphere you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Headline News (song)

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Headline News (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of 11JORN -- 11JORN (talk) 23:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Remember You (Adventure Time)

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article I Remember You (Adventure Time) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of SL93 -- SL93 (talk) 00:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Remember You (Adventure Time)

The article I Remember You (Adventure Time) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:I Remember You (Adventure Time) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of SL93 -- SL93 (talk) 00:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Remember You (Adventure Time)

The article I Remember You (Adventure Time) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:I Remember You (Adventure Time) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of SL93 -- SL93 (talk) 00:28, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Headline News (song)

The article Headline News (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Headline News (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of 11JORN -- 11JORN (talk) 22:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Headline News (song)

The article Headline News (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Headline News (song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of 11JORN -- 11JORN (talk) 12:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of It Came from the Nightosphere

The article It Came from the Nightosphere you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:It Came from the Nightosphere for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of It Came from the Nightosphere

The article It Came from the Nightosphere you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:It Came from the Nightosphere for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 22:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Simon & Marcy

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Simon & Marcy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Pedro thy master -- Pedro thy master (talk) 04:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Simon and Marcy

I'm reviewing it, congrats on the great work. Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 04:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Simon & Marcy

The article Simon & Marcy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Simon & Marcy for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Pedro thy master -- Pedro thy master (talk) 13:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Belated reply

Sorry for the late reply, I'm rather busy at the moment and can't seem to find much time! Reviewers are in short supply, to be honest. I tend to have the same few people whom I ask to look things over; the best way to get reviews (in theory) is to review other articles at PR or FAC. Some reviewers are more inclined to look at articles by those who review themselves, but this is not always reliable. It may be worth asking people who've reviewed before to do so again, although as you say it is generally good not to have to pester them. But reviewers generally are scarce; good copy-editors even more so. Possibly hanging around at FAC and seeing who reviews or copy-edits regularly may be another way forward. I'm certainly always happy to help, but I cannot always guarantee a prompt response, particularly at the moment! Sarastro1 (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Adventure Time (season 6) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adventure Time (season 6) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure Time (season 6) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EditorEat ma talk page up, scotty! 19:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ben-Folds-Tiny-Dancer-229641.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ben-Folds-Tiny-Dancer-229641.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Ayo, Gen., would you be ready to review "The Ed-touchables / Nagged to Ed"? I had once asked you to take a look at "The Ed-Touchables" but sadly had to fail the nomination because of lack of sources. However, I have now digged out a number of reviews (which was missing the most) and other types of sources and re-wrote the article (with its half-hour pair). We had a nice reviewing relationship a while back and it was working well, could we re-establish it? :) Peace, YOLO, Swag, --Khanassassin ☪ 17:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd be willing to look at it. It might take a few days before I can review it completely, but I shall.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, brotha. Give me a call whenever you're in need of one (or maybe..I'll call you :O ... Toom-Toom-Toooooooom!). --Khanassassin ☪ 19:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)--Khanassassin ☪ 19:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adventure Time (pilot)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adventure Time (pilot) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khanassassin -- Khanassassin (talk) 12:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adventure Time (pilot)

The article Adventure Time (pilot) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Adventure Time (pilot) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khanassassin -- Khanassassin (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adventure Time (pilot)

The article Adventure Time (pilot) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Adventure Time (pilot) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khanassassin -- Khanassassin (talk) 15:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

re: Peer-Review/Copy-edit Help

Hey Gen. Quon/Archive 3, you have a reply at my talk page, for when you have a moment czar · · 14:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Know it all Ed

Perhaps I'm a bit annoying with the Ed, Edd n Eddy reviews, but I would really appreciate if you took a look at "Know it all Ed", which is considerably shorter than the last article. I'm about to take a look at one or two of your AT articles, btw. :) Cheers, --Khanassassin ☪ 18:23, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I can do it.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks brotha, I'm takin' a look at "Mortal Folly" right now as well. Sorry if I'm a pain in the you-know-what because of all these EEnE review requests. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 18:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mortal Folly

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mortal Folly you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khanassassin -- Khanassassin (talk) 18:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mortal Recoil

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mortal Recoil you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Khanassassin -- Khanassassin (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey Gen. Quon. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mortal Folly

The article Mortal Folly you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Mortal Folly for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khanassassin -- Khanassassin (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mortal Recoil

The article Mortal Recoil you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Mortal Recoil for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khanassassin -- Khanassassin (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of UHF – Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article UHF – Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 22:10, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of UHF – Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff

The article UHF – Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:UHF – Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 23:10, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bad Hair Day

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bad Hair Day you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry if this takes me a little while longer - it's proving a bit more difficult than my review for UHF. LazyBastardGuy 19:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Running with Scissors (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Running with Scissors (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 03:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of UHF – Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff

The article UHF – Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:UHF – Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Other Stuff for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andy's Play

The article Andy's Play you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Andy's Play for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 23:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bad Hair Day

The article Bad Hair Day you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Bad Hair Day for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 06:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bad Hair Day

The article Bad Hair Day you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bad Hair Day for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 01:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:AdventureTimeSeason2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:AdventureTimeSeason2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Running with Scissors (album)

The article Running with Scissors (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Running with Scissors (album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 06:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Running with Scissors (album)

The article Running with Scissors (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Running with Scissors (album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 03:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

The Office edits

Hello, I hope my clarification on what I meant by "redundant phrasing" clears up the misunderstanding I think you had when I removed those phrases. Let me know if you still have an issue. Davejohnsan (talk) 19:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Christening (The Office)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Christening (The Office) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ajmint -- Ajmint (talk) 17:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Christening (The Office)

The article Christening (The Office) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Christening (The Office) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ajmint -- Ajmint (talk) 22:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Christening (The Office)

The article Christening (The Office) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Christening (The Office) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ajmint -- Ajmint (talk) 07:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pedra da Gávea

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pedra da Gávea you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ColonelHenry -- ColonelHenry (talk) 01:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Classy Christmas

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Classy Christmas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 21:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sex Ed (The Office)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sex Ed (The Office) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Sex Ed (The Office)‎ to Good Article status. Thanks for your incredibly prolific contributions--keep it up! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

I did include one suggestion in the review for you to look at. How many episodes do you have left to go before you've done the whole show? -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sex Ed (The Office)

The article Sex Ed (The Office) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sex Ed (The Office) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:32, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

One Son

Thank you for your glowing words! I'll aim to complete the look over of "One Son" for you by the end of the month. JudyCS (talk) 22:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

I have completed your requested copy edit of "One Son". JudyCS (talk) 03:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pedra da Gávea

The article Pedra da Gávea you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pedra da Gávea for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ColonelHenry -- ColonelHenry (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

GA review

Pedra da Gávea, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Mdann52talk to me! 07:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Sorry to see this nastiness with the blog post, but thanks for taking it with such courtesy and aplomb. Have some pie and enjoy the day! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I was kinda blind-sided by a lot of this, but I realize that issues that need to be fixed should be called out. I just could do without some of the ad hominem attacks.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that was uncalled for. My understanding is that the blog author and your GA reviewer had already been going at it for several weeks in various forums (resulting in a block of the blogger and his furious resignation from Wikipedia) before your article became a convenient way to seek revenge. That's why the tone is so nutso even when the points are good. Obviously those errors did need to be fixed, and the article delisted for now, but this wouldn't have turned into such a contretemps without those personalities being predisposed to ugliness. Sorry you found yourself caught in the middle of it; geologists are a rougher bunch than I would have thought! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Viewing Party

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Viewing Party you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Taylor Trescott -- Taylor Trescott (talk) 21:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Home

I was just going to leave some comments on "Home" but it unfortunately says it has been archived, as does as "The Unnatural". Does this mean it has been closed without consensus? Yikes. Sorry. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:09, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, it has. Strangely, there were a few "supports" on it. Oh well... I'll just renominate it... in a month (maybe I can talk to the delegates and see if I can renominate them quicker, since there weren't any glaring errors).--Gen. Quon (Talk) 23:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh wow, that was sudden. Let me know when you renominate "Home". I'd be happy to give it another lookover and probably support. I apologize for forgetting about it earlier! Ruby 2010/2013 23:32, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Smells like Nirvana - FAC?

What do you think about taking Smells Like Nirvana to FA? As the likely major contributor on it, you should clearly have say, but I'd be happy to run the nomination for it if you don't have time/interest in doing that. I haven't checked the article against some of the basic checks (sourcing, ref formatting, etc.), but in terms of content and writing, I think the rest of it is there and ready to go (short of any possible copyediting). --MASEM (t) 01:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Million Awards

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Adventure Time (estimated annual readership: 2,875,000) and The X-Files (estimated annual readership: 1,402,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment--few users complete even one article of this prominence, much less two!--and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display these userboxes:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing The X-Files to Good Article status.

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Adventure Time to Good Article status.

Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014

Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 01:45, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

The Unnatural

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at WWB Too's talk page.
Message added 18:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Adventure Time

While I'm pretty sure you're wrong about what you put in your edit summary about your reason for reverting my edit in the Adventure Time article, why don't you take the time to actually LOOK at the changes I made. There were 25 instances of commas going after quotation marks in that article and most of them were for episode titles. In any case, I know for a fact you are wrong, read any professional writings out there and you can see that I'm right, commas do not go after quotations, and after I'm done leaving this message I do plan on bringing this up on that page's designated talk page. –Nahald (talk) 02:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

See talk page.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quick FL question

The FL instructions say that "Users should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed." That implies that you should do one at a time, or at least wait until a list is near promotion before nomming another. Then again, you're not supposed to call good users unproductive either, and that didn't seem to stop this person. I don't know why I keep editing here sometimes. Anyway, I trust your judgment, and you can always seek out a co-nominator if necessary, like you did with the two X-Files FACs (I returned to the first one, BTW). Giants2008 (Talk) 19:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of What Was Missing

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article What Was Missing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gabriel Yuji -- Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of What Was Missing

The article What Was Missing you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:What Was Missing for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gabriel Yuji -- Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Viewing Party

The article Viewing Party you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Viewing Party for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Taylor Trescott -- Taylor Trescott (talk) 23:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adventure Time (season 5)

The article Adventure Time (season 5) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Adventure Time (season 5) for things which need to be addressed.

Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 1ST7 (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks so much for covering for me on that GA nomination. Blurred Lines 01:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem! Glad I could help!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

The Unnatural

Thanks for your patience. I struck my oppose and I've left some final comments on the FAC page. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

The Science Fiction Barnstar

		The Science Fiction Barnstar
		Thank you Gen. Quon for going the extra mile to help promote The Unnatural (The X-Files) to FA status. On behalf of the article's future audience, I hereby award you the The Science Fiction Barnstar. Please accept it --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 11:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Home Sweet Hut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Home Sweet Hut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home Sweet Hut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 11:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hello! A GAN Backlog Drive will begin in less than 4 days! In past Backlog Drives, the goal was to reduce the backlog of Good article nominations. In the upcoming drive, another goal will be added - raising as much money as we can for the Wikimedia Foundation. How will this work? Well, its pretty simple. Any user interested in donating can submit a pledge at the Backlog Drive page (linked above). The pledge should mention the amount of money the user is willing to donate per review. For example, if a user pledges 5 cents per review and 100 nominations are reviewed, the total donation amount is $5.00. At the time this message was sent out, two users have submitted pledges for a total of 8 cents per review. All pledges, no matter how much money, are greatly appreciated. Also, in no way is this saying you must make a pledge. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or leave a message on the Backlog Drive talk page. And remember, there are less than 4 days before the drive starts!--EdwardsBot (talk) 03:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

The Office (U.S. season 9)

Hi Gen Quon, I've checked with one of the FAC delegates, Ian Rose, who has agreed that The Office (U.S. season 9) falls more within the article category than in with the lists. If you could indicate on the FAC that you wish to withdraw then we can enact accordingly. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 08:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I'll close off the FLC shortly for you (on business trip at the mo). If you go down the FAC route, drop me a note and I'll be happy to review it there for you. Cheers. - SchroCat (talk) 11:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013! If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive! If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ricardio the Heart Guy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ricardio the Heart Guy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- Ruby2010 (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fionna and Cake

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fionna and Cake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of New Age Retro Hippie -- New Age Retro Hippie (talk) 12:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)