User talk:Gemsforhealing

Don't spam Wikipedia with AI-generated content

Hello, please do not spam Wikipedia with AI-generated content. Thank you, Gnom (talk) 13:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Some of this information could potentially be added to the section on rose quartz in the existing article quartz, though it does not look as if any of the sources used in this draft would meet the criteria for reliable sources. The content about esotheric uses does not belong in a Wikipedia article, I'm afraid.

bonadea contributions talk 14:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gemsforhealing! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 14:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

" Gemsforhealing (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Beet sugar factory. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. On this article and several others, such as Fitness to dive, you seem to be adding chatbot content which is unsourced. This behavior resembles the editing history of James Sweets. If you are the same person or using the same account, this is not allowed on Wikipedia. Zefr (talk) 15:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]