User talk:Gecg

Welcome

Hello Gecg. I see I am the first person to leave a message on your talk page, so let me belatedly welcome you to Wikipedia. If you run into any difficulties or have questions, please let me know.

Regarding the page Turing completeness, could you leave a note on Talk:Turing completeness explaining what you are concerned about there? I would look into it, but I am not sure exactly what you would like to see improved. Thanks, — Carl (CBM · talk) 11:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Hp10s-_scientific_calc-frontal-image.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hp10s-_scientific_calc-frontal-image.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. -- Autopilot (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Citation needed

Re this edit - please note that the date must be placed in the relevant named parameter, ie |date=August 2010, and not in an unnamed parameter; this is to ensure that the automatic categorisation is carried out correctly. Further, a planned improvement to {{citation needed}} will cause text in the first unnamed parameter to display, like this:

glass and all metals except iridium.

A bot has fixed your edit, and the page now shows in Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2010. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:00, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Pradyot Patnaik

I am trying to figure out why you are citing the book Pradyot Patnaik. Handbook of Inorganic Chemicals. So far as I can tell, this is an pretty obscure source, but maybe I am mistaken. I have spent some time replacing references to this book so your additions are of interest to me. Is Patnaik widely used in Brazil?--Smokefoot (talk) 12:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

My point is that, despite teaching inorganic for many years, I had never heard of Patnaik or the scientist until I started checking Wikipedia. So I am suspicious of the authority of the source. For preps and basic properties, I prefer Brauer's Handbook/Handbuch because he and his coeditors were obviously close to the chemistry (published scholars), and the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics because it has been through so many editions and thus so much checking. My guess, and that is all I can do since I have never seen the book, is that Patnaik is a consolidator of work published by others and the book is lacking in stature/credibility. That is the reason you will find me occassionally replacing refs to Patnaik with other sources. In any case, thanks for the response.--Smokefoot (talk) 11:54, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Hp10s- scientific calc-frontal-image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hp10s- scientific calc-frontal-image.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of HP-10s

The article HP-10s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any coverage of this device apart from sites selling it, and no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!