User talk:Ge Sheng-da

October 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Open Data Watch, from its old location at User:Ge Sheng-da/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC) @Liance:Thank you for moving the draft to the correct location. I am new to Wikipedia editing, so learning as I go and, as a retired journalist, looking forward to contributing as I can. 戈胜达 (talk) 16:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ge Sheng-da, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI

Hello, Ge Sheng-da. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Open Data Watch, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Pabsoluterince (talk) 14:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pabsoluterince:Thank you for the getting started message. Noted. I'm a 70 yr-old, retired, old-school journalist who is indeed just getting started with this, but hopes to be able to learn well-enough Wikipedia coding to be eventually of some service. G (pronounced Gee) 戈胜达 (talk) 17:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries then G. I will suggest some pages that can help teach you some wiki coding. Check out this page for help referencing, it will point you to templates that can be helpful. This page will help you put links to other wikipedia pages and external sources. That should help a bit, if you have anymore coding queries feel free to ask. Also I suggest taking a look at Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary, for help creating your article. Pabsoluterince (talk) 02:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open Data Watch (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need independent reliable sources that are specifically about Open Data Watch.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Open Data Watch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Open Data Watch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ge Sheng-da! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Open Data Watch

Hello, Ge Sheng-da. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Open Data Watch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Open Data Watch

Hello, Ge Sheng-da. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Open Data Watch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:50, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]