User talk:Gcbirzan

Gypsy discussion

If you think that discussion was important, you can transfer that particular section to another page, and your comment will be unmolested, and you can write a huge essay if you please. Decius 01:55, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

While on your talk page, you can do whatever you want, the same rules don't apply to other talk pages. Also, the dicussion itself is GDPL, so I have the right to delete it. Nevertheless, thanks! --gcbirzan^talk 02:03, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

User:Coolcat

[edit]

Thanks for the typo correction :) --Cool Cat 08:04, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

You're welcome! --gcbirzan^talk 08:28, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Romanian Wikinews set up

[edit]

Hello Gcbirzan!

You are one of the people who expressed interest in working on a Romanian edition of the Wikinews project. It is now set up at http://ro.wikinews.org. Please participate in the creation of the project. If you're looking for building blocks to translate, you may find some of the following pages helpful:

I also invite you to join the IRC channel #wikinews on irc.freenode.net, which is used by the international Wikinews community to coordinate citizen reporting, and to subscribe to the international Wikinews mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in the project, and good luck!--Eloquence

vote

[edit]

Hi Gcbirzan,

Please clarify on Meta whether a merge of the two designs is your first choice, or a complete change is.

Hum. I thought I did. I said that a complete change is my first choice, merging header and languages my second and merging the header my third. --gcbirzan^talk 16:50, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

elegance

[edit]

Concerning the proposal for deletion of 1111111111, you wrote:

How is this less notable than (random pick): A simple proof that 22/7 exceeds pi.

I'm surprised. The proof that 22/7 exceeds pi is very elegant. "1111111111" on the other hand, has an enormous amount of arbitraryness in it, in the choice of a base-10 numeral system, in the design of the system of units of measurement of time, in historical accidents, etc. 22/7 is an early convergent in the simple continued fraction expansion of π, and is thus a very natural non-arbitrary thing to consider, and the simplicity and the elegant pattern in the integrals involved does not result from arbitrary human choices. If I had to judge you on this comment alone, I'd have to say you're an uncouth Philistine. Michael Hardy 20:00, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Our forum

[edit]

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 18:21, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radu Ştefan Mazăre

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Radu Ștefan Mazăre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Local Baron

[edit]

I have nominated Local Baron, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Local Baron. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pcap ping 11:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

[edit]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:12, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Gcbirzan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Gcbirzan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Gcbirzan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]