User talk:Gbarrientos1/sandbox
Gabe's Peer review
[edit]5 elements of review 1. A lead section that is easy to understand: Yes, but perhaps add more with regards to the major 5 W's: who, what, where and why. Simple and clear.. then your body paragraph will describe more. 2. A clear structure: Yes, but can improve the upon the table of context and minor grammar improvements. 3. A balanced coverage: Not so much, need more relevant facts. maybe a timeline will help. 4. A Neutral content: Yes. 5. A reliable sources: Yes A few additional suggestions: - when you use acronyms such as NRHP first indicate that the National Register of Historic Places is in fact NRHP for example: National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). - perhaps instead of just listing facts make transition sentences. - You've also mentioned an agreement passed in 1994. What is that agreement called. - This article could also benefit from a floor plan on how the Brea City Hall and Park are laid out when referring to its key features. - My final comment is to keep in mind that your audience/readers knows nothing of your topic or concepts so it best to not assume they do with some ideas and or terms. Brit587 (talk) 07:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)brit587Brit587 (talk) 07:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)