User talk:Gbabeux

Welcome!

Hello, Gbabeux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:33, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear: If you are being "granted permission" to use various images, that means you're in contact with the subjects of various articles you've been attempting to create, and likely being paid by them. You have not made the mandatory disclosures required in such an instance, nor followed any of the conflict of interest guidelines, including never directly editing or creating an article about which you have a conflict of interest, but instead leaving such work for an editor without such a conflict to review. Since your editing has also been disruptive, you will remain blocked until and unless you agree to fully and thoroughly disclose all editing for pay and to without fail follow the conflict of interest processes including never to directly edit or create an article where you have a conflict. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Gbabeux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am very sorry that I did not disclosed the conflict of interest. I have read the article concerning how to disclose this yesterday but I did not have the chance yet to properly edit the pages I managed. I also now understand that I should not publish in the mainspace any articles that have a conflict of interest. Instead, I should always create a draft and send it for review so that another user which does not have a conflict of interest can properly review the article and choose if it is illegible to be published (also not edit anything directly if I have a conflict of interest).So, I agree to fully and thoroughly disclose all editing for pay and to without fail follow the conflict of interest processes including never to directly edit or create an article where you have a conflict. I also understand that I cannot post any copyrighted material on Wikipedia. Concerning the images, I have asked yesterday to the copyright owner to give me a properly written statement releasing the copyrights or a statement that release the copyright under a free copyright license (Would this be okay ?). Again, I am sorry about what I have done and I won't do these errors again. Thank you.

Accept reason:

As you've agreed to follow policy going forward, I've unblocked your account. If you're unclear on what's expected or what you'd need to do, you can ask a question at the teahouse and someone will give you some advice. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure notices

{{Connected contributor}} notices belong on the talk page of the affected article, not here on your user talk page.

I also advise you to use the {{Paid}} template on your user page, User:Gbabeux. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:08, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed the {{paid}} templates on your user page. Feel free to correct them if I have made any errors.

I would also recommend that you look at MOS:HEAD and MOS:HEADCAPS to learn about the style conventions for section headings. Note that an article's lead paragraph does not have a heading. Wikipedia's Manual of Style exists to keep a consistent look and feel amongst all articles. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gbabeux! You created a thread called Question concerning COI disclosure and images copyrights at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by User:Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amritha Aiyer has been accepted

Amritha Aiyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 19:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amritha Aiyer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amritha Aiyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amritha Aiyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 14:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Gbabeux. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Signature

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (such as the Teahouse) (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Mathur (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is all kinds of personal style unsourced material and the page lacks an encyclopedic tone. Deleted a few days ago from mainspace G11 advertising

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajay Mathur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ajay Mathur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 05:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eliya Cioccolato (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Biblioworm was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources, and there are far too many links in the bottom.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eliya Cioccolato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eliya Cioccolato, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Biblio (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gbabeux! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Biblio (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Hi, I don't understand why you blocked my account at all. I DO NOT have any other accounts. If you banned because of the image upload for the Ajay Mathur article, the other that uploaded the images is the account of Ajay Mathur himself, not me. He uploaded the photos. I work for him (it's clearly stated by the way) so we communicated together. Also, he had the rights to post those images on Wikimedia. We opened a case with Wikimedia and they allowed us to add those images and still, you guys banned me from uploading on Wikimedia the same day that the staff from Wikimedia told us we could upload the images under CC0 copyright. And now this... You think I used two accounts to upload images ? No. It was not my account. I only have this one. You can also check the ips, I am from Canada so it's not possible that I am the account holder of an account if it is not from Canada. Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks. ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gbabeux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I don't understand why you blocked my account at all. I DO NOT have any other accounts. If you banned because of the image upload for the Ajay Mathur article, the other that uploaded the images is the account of Ajay Mathur himself, not me. He uploaded the photos. I work for him (it's clearly stated by the way) so we communicated together. Also, he had the rights to post those images on Wikimedia. We opened a case with Wikimedia and they allowed us to add those images and still, you guys banned me from uploading on Wikimedia the same day that the staff from Wikimedia told us we could upload the images under CC0 copyright. And now this... You think I used two accounts to upload images ? No. It was not my account. I only have this one. You can also check the ips, I am from Canada so it's not possible that I am the account holder of an account if it is not from Canada. Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks.

Decline reason:

We did check the IP address, and more. Sockpuppetry between this account and the following accounts are confirmed: Hassan Mohaidly (talk · contribs), Rubyking27 (talk · contribs), Drevs21 (talk · contribs). Yamla (talk) 00:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gbabeux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I logged into this account a couple of times because my client Hassan Mohaidly, asked me to post an article for him so he could edit it himself afterwards. He paid me for it and it got declined during review from what I can remember. This was like a month or two ago. I do not own this account and it is not related in any way with mine so I am not quite sure I deserve to be blocked because I logged in into this account like 2 or 3 times to edit one simple article. I even have proof of him asking me to login on his account.

Decline reason:

Since you admit to wp:sockpuppetry (and WP:ROLE), and since you provide no reason for unblocking, this block stands. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:56, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Mathur (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajay Mathur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ajay Mathur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ajay Mathur

Hello, Gbabeux. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ajay Mathur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ~GMCmc ^{{talk to me}} 20:25, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]