User talk:Gazzelle

Welcome!

Hello, Gazzelle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Xiner (talk, email) 18:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is an invitation to join WikiProject Bristol.

Thank you for editing the article Public transport in Bristol.

You may be interested in joining WikiProject Bristol. This WikiProject aims to improve the standard of all articles relating to Bristol, which includes all subdivisions of the city, major buildings, roads and other related articles.

You can help by:

Creating new articles.
Expanding stubs.
Adding photographs.
Referencing articles.
Research topics.
Anything else really...

For more information, see the project page, and if you have any questions you can leave them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bristol and someone will get back to you. — Addbot (talk) 02:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

— Rod ^talk 18:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bristol infoboxes

Hi following your comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bristol I've added infoboxes to: Montpelier, Bristol, Stapleton, Bristol, St Andrews, Bristol and Severn Beach Line. Unfortunately I've had to leave quite a few gaps where I don't have the info eg population stats, postcodes etc for the areas & lots of info re number of rails, electrification etc on the Severn Beach Line. You said you were still learning about editing, if I can help let me know, or for local articles just post a message on the bristol project talk page.— Rod ^talk 20:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on the To Do box

That's a good addition to Islamic feminism. BrainyBabe 15:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Resolution (association of family law practitioners), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 22:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Resolution (association of family law practitioners)

The article Resolution (association of family law practitioners) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

none of the references show notability for the organisation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hermeneutics of feminism in Islam

Hi,

I came across this promising article Hermeneutics of feminism in Islam (relating to women's rights) and myself supported the same editorially too. IMO since topic potential is vast many Reliable sources on Google scholar seem to be available hence the article needs more editorial hands for some more update and expansion along with appropriate references.

Pl. do join to update and expansion, your help will be most welcome.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 01:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]