User talk:Gazifikator

Armenian Genocide denial

See Talk:Denial of the Armenian Genocide --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 11:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert my well-sourced additions. If you think some sources are missing, please add them yourself. I've done my part by adding half a dozen; you can contribute too. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 15:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop joking. What you're doing is misinterpretation of MY own sources [1]. Your deletion of 'guerilla' is a biased POV-pushing. Did you read any of them to make your "changes"?Gazifikator (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

gaz, i didn't delete it, i moved it. you have to read. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 16:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Im going to report you. what you're doing is permanent POV-pushing and deletion of sourced material. you add what you want to see. Gazifikator (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please go ahead. I'm deleting sourced material? That's a good one. Perhaps you want to move the citations after the word "guerrilla"? If so, go ahead. All I am doing is making the sentence read more naturally. Your version was stilted. I don't doubt that he leads a guerrilla movement. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 16:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your edits deffer from each other. you dont doubt it in the last one. i believe we need to have some principles Gazifikator (talk) 07:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You made an edit to Denial of the Armenian Genocide at 14:34, 6 March 2009, with the comment "Genocide convention: it is a view by a Baroness. no statement or a research on history" I have reverted your edits to that section because Baroness Ramsey was the Spokesperson of Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs in the House of Lords and was speaking for the British Government. You can find out that this is still the British Governments position by reading this link dated 7 December 2007. --PBS (talk) 11:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss you reversals of my edits of the Denial of the Armenian Genocide and Recognition of the Armenian Genocide on the relevant talk pages. --PBS (talk) 07:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Gazifikator, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ikip (talk) 03:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moses of Chorene

I've been monitoring the page through my live RC feed. I'll leave a note for all editors to stay away from major content changes and stick to consensus building. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the fast reply! Can I ask you also to check this editors [2] activities, I just dont know if I can notice about his edits anywhere else? He is adding unjustified tags to Armenian Genocide-related articles and pushing denialist sources. Gazifikator (talk) 15:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Julfa, Azerbaijan (city). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Sandstein 20:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be advised that if I see you involved in an Azerbaijan-related edit war one more time, I will sanction you under Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Amended Remedies and Enforcement. Sandstein 20:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm ... One of the "usual suspects" strikes again, with his usual trumped-up charges. Gazifikator - I suggest you appeal immediately against the editing restriction. Do it while the dung is still fresh and smelly. Meowy 19:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Meowy! I afraid that I just cant take this dirty game you mentioned seriously! Should I? Gazifikator (talk) 05:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Lewis

The Lewis article may be a bit redundant (and is way too long as are most W articles for my taste), but I think you have erased a well written sentence and now the less well written stuff dominates the head of the article, so I have reverted your revert. Also, his work on the history of the Ottoman empire should be mentioned very early on.--Radh (talk) 08:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really wanted to avoid any ideological clashes this time around and did not revert from my pov stance. And I really think the article could be half as long, as many more on W.. But at least his early work of the history of Turkey was well respected in academia. It is of course always good to find sources, but the Lewis book I have read on the history of the Ottoman empire was not ideological in any strong sense and he cannot have gotten his "infamous" reputation (he def has) with it. I know everything is ideological in the end etc, but I know the difference between a work of Holocaust denial and a strongly opinionated, but serious text. I will try to find a citation, but am to ignorant to really debate the things you are interested in. I just consider it rude to simply revert hotly debated things, so have tried to give a reason.--Radh (talk) 09:17, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for so detailed answer! In reality, I have not the good knowledge of his academic works on OE, I know about his late denialist works and related critics, so I'm trying to make the article more neutral. It is important to mention topics where he is obviously controversial, to not have him cited in genocide-related articles as a reliable scholar of OE. And yes, his late works are rather ideological, than academic, but many people don't see the difference. Gazifikator (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Perhaps you are right and Wikipedia should concentrate on the controversial stuff, the things people get upset about. But there are many people here who want this to be the new Britannica. I am all for a good fight, but it is also nice if articles are well written and also look good.

Just had a look at a discussion page of Denial of Armenian holocaust. What a mess! Good luck to you.--Radh (talk) 06:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks! File:Blush.png Sardur (talk) 14:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal: Recognition of the Armenian

See Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-06-30/Recognition of the Armenian Genocide. As I opened the case I think it only fair that you make the first statement. --PBS (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia–Turkey relations reversions

With reference to Armenia–Turkey relations, I would caution you to not be so quick to undo another editor. Edit warring is totally unhelpful. You are probably already aware of the discretionary sanctions remedy of the Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 arbitration case, but, for the purposes of this log, I attach this formal notification:

“

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, including blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision.

”

If I can be of assistance, in arbitration enforcement matters or otherwise, please contact me. AGK 20:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mate! A new discussion was opened on the talk-page of the Armenian Genocide article for adding a new section to the Article. The proposed new paragraph is meant to be about Patriocide, along with other losses due to Genocide. Would be glad to see more contributors. Regards, Aregakn (talk) 19:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Paragraph for the Article of the Armenian Genocide: "Patriocide"

Hello mate! A new discussion was opened on the talk-page of the Armenian Genocide article for adding a new section to the Article. The proposed new paragraph is meant to be about Patriocide, along with other losses due to Genocide. Would be glad to see more contributors. Regards, Aregakn (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parajanov.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parajanov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crtalaat.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crtalaat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vojir.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vojir.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alexander Gitovich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Li Bo

Hovhannes Shiraz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Andrey Dementyev

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 23:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In case it's not 100% clear, the arbcom restrictions placed on your sock account here apply to this account as well. You are restricted to 1RR on all AA articles in the future. Kuru (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tamara Toumanova

Hello Gazifikator/Rast5.

Your recent editing history at Tamara Toumanova shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 10:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Tamara Toumanova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Charles Aznavour Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klas-Göran Karlsson

The article Klas-Göran Karlsson has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Aaron Booth (talk) 20:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Holy Apostles Monastery

Hello Gazafikator, do you speak/read/write Armenian?? If yes, would you mind helping me to translate the article. --Yerevanci (talk) 18:16, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to be useful. By the way there are 2 good sources in English too. Gazifikator (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Makhluto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Georgia and Sardarapat

Henri Verneuil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Oscar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:The trial of ASALA members in Paris, 1984.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The trial of ASALA members in Paris, 1984.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mushegh Galshoyan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mushegh Galshoyan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George Ponderevo (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Mushegh Galshoyan

Hi Gazifikator, you recently removed a deletion tag from Mushegh Galshoyan. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

I see you sate that you have rewritten Mushegh Galshoyan. However, it is my opinion that the results constitute a Close paraphrasing of the original. I've found that if I copy and paste the material, and try to rewrite it, that it still ends up too close to the original. A better approach is to find more than one source (always desirable), then, put them aside, and write about the subject in one's own words. After writing, return to the original text, and determine whether it is too close (if you have a better memory than I do), or if some points would be better made by an explicit quote and attribution, with the quote suitably short.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 21:48, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raymond Kevorkian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond Kevorkian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Kevorkian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 21:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for creating the new article Raymond Kevorkian and for your efforts to improve the encyclopedia for the public. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

message

I left a message on User:Grandmaster's talk pages on Armenians in Azerbaijan. Sprutt (talk) 01:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To Gazificator: Regarding your post today at http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Armenian_Genocide&diff=495790789&oldid=495787044 you have just made a grave mistake. You posted a forgery of an edit that I did not do on the date and at the time indicated. My edit today was on in section 2.1 "The Young Turk Revolution of 1908", the last paragraph. This reflects very badly on your judgement and constitutes an unethical attempt to impeach my credentials as an editor. I did not touch line 37 in my last edit. Please take note. Diranakir (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GAZIFICATOR: I have let Dispute Resolution Noticeboard know about the conflict you have created between us and asked for their involvement ( http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&action=submit#editform ) Diranakir (talk) 23:16, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am a volunteer clerk/mediator at WP:DRN. What Diranakir is claiming did not and can not happen. It is not possible for someone to modify a diff while leaving your name on it. (Admins can delete, nobody can modify.) This was explained to Diranakir in great detail by two different mediators at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Armenian Genocide. Diranakir's continued false accusations against Gazifikator after being informed that they are impossible are bordering on WP:HARASSMENT. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai Bayev

Noted your removal of Parishan's propaganda. I've got a book in Armenian that is about Armenian architects who worked in Baku, Yerevan, and Tbilisi at the turn of the 19th century. It has a chapter on Bayev if more info is needed. I can't read Armenian so it would need to be translated. Meowy 15:52, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It must be interesting. Do you have a scan? If yes, you can send it by e-mail (by the form "E-mail this user"). Gazifikator (talk) 16:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I got your email. Will respond. I am investigating the implications of discussing it here. Meowy 15:24, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that the discussion be in the context of a broader discussion about pre and post-Russian Revolution Armenian architects. There is no such Wikipedia article, so you will not be breaking your edit restriction. Meowy 16:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above may not work. See here: [3]. I think you should appeal the topic ban. Meowy 00:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Development of articles

Gazificator, you added a paragraph in Khojaly Massacre, which definitely improves the aerticle. I was trying to reedit your text but when you revert Grandmaster's editwarring you erase my edits already for the second time. Please be more careful. Sprutt (talk) 04:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AA2

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Gazifikator. Brandmeister^talk 09:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of topic ban

You are notified that, as a result of an arbitration enforcement filing, you are indefinitely topic-banned from editing all articles and other related pages covered by the Armenia-Azerbaijan arbitration case, construed broadly, including but not limited to discussion of such articles on any page. You may appeal this ruling to the imposing administrator, the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, or the arbitration committee as normal, either on the basis of error or to be lifted after a period of good behavior. While the ban is in place, any edit in defiance of the ban will lead to a block from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:15, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AE

Please see this AE request: [4] Grandmaster 20:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for renewed sockpuppeting, as found in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gazifikator. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alikhanian-Alikhanov mass spectrometer

The article Alikhanian-Alikhanov mass spectrometer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kkmurray (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klas-Göran Karlsson

The article Klas-Göran Karlsson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ^{~Come at me~} 23:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Alikhanian.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alikhanian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ismail Shabanov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ismail Shabanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismail Shabanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WikiVirusC^(talk) 19:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]