User talk:Gaylencrufts

November 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Yorktown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 04:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Yorktown, you may be blocked from editing.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 04:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to War of 1812 with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 23:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Shadowjams (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Troubles restrictions

The article Irish Rebellion of 1798, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a previous Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are:

All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.
All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per day). When in doubt, assume it is related.
- Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty
Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.

If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first. Thank you.

2 lines of K₃₀₃ 08:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

France, Spain Dutch citation.

(1) Please do not revert War of 1812 contribution at 'United States' introduction again without discussion. Read the two sections at Talk, all the way through -- War of 1812, intro reverted. In collaboration with two other editors with a perspective similar to yours, I added a pic and text in the 'settlement' section to present a more balanced view of Amerindians in the article narrative.

(2) A third-party administrator, ruled that since you had a warning on something else, all was probably okay. See -- War-of-1812 - THREE reverts without discussion.

(3) I do AGREE with your copyedit which has been reverted, The new nation, with direct help from France, Spain and the Dutch Republic, defeated Britain in the American Revolution.

(4) One citation and quote is Langley, Lester D., | America and the Americas: The United States in the Western Hemisphere 1989. ISBN 978-0-8203-3716-6, p.8. Viewed December 4, 2012.

- - "The Caribbean was also a critical theater in the war. American patriots received aid, particularly vital military supplies, from the French, Spanish, Dutch, and even the British Isles." page.8.

(5) This footnote is formatted so that you can slide it behind the text of the existing note inside the <ref></ref>code. That way the sentence has only one note number, but two citations. That keeps the visual clutter down, something most editors don't concern themselves with.

(6) If your contribution, direct help from France, Spain and the Dutch Republic is reverted again AFTER you source it, take it to the Talk page, click on 'New section' title it 'France, Spain & Dutch Republic', explain your source, and let the wikiedit process begin. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 06:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gaylencrufts. You have new messages at Talk:Korean War.
Message added 07:10, 18 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

re United States

Please do not make this edit again before discussing it on the talk page. You are engaging in an edit war, please stop. --Golbez (talk) 04:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United States

Pease go Talk:United_States to discuss about US allies during American Revolutionary War.--Monsieur Fou (talk) 10:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]