User talk:Gaurav/Talk archive May 2010 to Sep 2011

Reviewer rights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Thanks! Unexpected, but a pleasant surprise :D -- Gaurav (talk) 06:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Hello Gaurav, I appreciate your effort of improvement of (meantime only) technical aspects of template. You wanted to show wikilinks to certain source of cumulative template. Interesting solution is made in the Taxon template that uses subtemplates like {{FishTaxon}}. Then it is possible to show its wikilinks Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:FishTaxon. If this is possible then it would be possible to use (in theory) subtemplate for every single source. Maybe you have already considered this because you are technically more skilled, but at least this is one of theoretical possibilities. Have a nice day. --Snek01 (talk) 11:25, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TaxonIds

A discussion is under way at Template talk:TaxonIds#Identifiers concerning the desired appearance of the identifers shown by {{TaxonIds}}. As a contributor to the last discussion, your input will be greatly appreciated. --Stemonitis (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice! -- Gaurav (talk) 18:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naresh Sonee

ok. lets stop the debate here. you mean to say that there is no proof / no single person here who had started any article on any one. and only 'few composers like all you few' from wikipedia are previlaged to start and decide the page of notability so your searches also reflects on google or newspapers as naresh sonee does here http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ . Anyway gaurav lets not behave schooly. after going through the hindi news coverage of sonee. and let's stop the debate here. isnt it? god bless u. (talk). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dralansun (talk • contribs) 17:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Media franchises

Wikipedia:WikiProject Media franchises, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Media franchises and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Media franchises during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 22:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]