User talk:Gascofield

Welcome!

Hello, Gascofield, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Slavery in the United States have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dawnseeker2000 22:08, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re: Changes were made to slavery in America because of mis-quotes from presented sources

Hello,

There's a few things that should be included with an edit. First, please use the edit summary every time you make a change to an article. Summarizing what changes you've made will not only help other editors who are monitoring articles and their development, it will also increase the chances that your edit will "stick". An explanation of what's been changed in an edit goes a long way in convincing others that the edit is indeed legitimate. Lots of shenanigans here on WP.

The other thing that is even more of a game-changer is the inclusion of a reliable source. Again, if an edit includes a reference that is reliable, and the contents of the edit match that of the reliable source, it will be looked upon as an improvement to the article.

These few things, when combined, form the basis for a good approach to WP editing. Oh, you can find a tutorial on how to include references in an article here. Good luck, Dawnseeker2000 22:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]