User talk:Garry Singh Girn

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you have been asked countless times to stop pushing your "Saini = Rajput" claims, and wait until the discussion reaches a consensus. By ignoring these requests and carrying on regardless, you are causing disruption to the project. When your block expires, discuss the changes and *wait for a consensus* before adding these claims again - if you do not, you will be blocked from editing for longer. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I've just seen that you added "Saini" again to Rajput. What part of "PLEASE DO NOT ADD ANY MORE ENTRIES TO THIS LIST - it is not intended to be a list of every single Rajput community but rather an example of some of the (supposedly) major ones. There are lists elsewhere that deal with the subject more extensively" do you not understand? That is there by consensus, and if you wish to change that consensus, you have been told you must discuss it first and get that limitation removed.
In fact, as your edit summary for that change made it clear that you were deliberately edit-warring against the current consensus, I have increased your block to indefinite. That does not mean you will be blocked forever, it just means you will not be unblocked until you give an explicit commitment to stop edit-warring, to stop adding your preferred POV to articles when it is clearly contentious, and to discuss all contentious additions and wait for a consensus before re-adding them. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Garry Singh Girn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here committing that i will stop edit-warring, stop adding my preferred POV to articles when it is clearly contentious, and I'll discuss all contentious additions and wait for a consensus before re-adding them. Please unblock me. I'll never repeat same mistakes again. I am new user, that's why i dont know all these. Thanks for telling me all these. Garry Singh Girn (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It appears that you created a new account to WP:EVADE this block. Sockpuppetry is not permitted (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.