User talk:Gardenstatelaw

Welcome!

Hello, Gardenstatelaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Michael Sorrentino. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Michael Sorrentino, you may be blocked from editing. Clearly not best known for his conviction, and you know this. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:49, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. You will be subject to sanctions for clear censorship. It is clear you are Mr. Sorrentino's agent. Proceed accordingly.

No. You will be subject to sanctions for clear censorship. It is clear you are Mr. Sorrentino's agent. Proceed accordingly. Gardenstatelaw (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 02:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be sued for censorship and harassment the next time you continue to censor and include a false narrative about this person. He is NOT a film star - no "Filmography". He is a felon and a man who lifted weights and got paid to be himself in front of cameras, much like a Youtuber. If you search for his name on Google, you will see that his prison life and conviction dominates search results. Most people, me included, were unaware of this very untalented man until he was convicted. Now - you may be a teen or a millennial who knows him in another capacity, but teens and millennials are a MINORITY. Most people know of this "muscle" man because of his conviction and you are concealing this. STOP IT. Gardenstatelaw (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)GardenStateLaw[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 02:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 02:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gardenstatelaw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was no threat to sue, it was clear that Melbourne "may" be sued (by the Police Department), not that Melbourne "will" be sued. It is likely that Melbourne is a paid Wikipedia Editor and is censoring Sorrentino's page for profit - and this is a criminal act since Sorrentino is on probation and barred from engaging in unlawful activity, e.g., paying someone to censor his felon status. Melbourne is attempting to censor that Sorrentino is a felon. It is unlawful and inappropriate for you you block me. Thank you. Gardenstatelaw (talk) 03:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Continuing to do exactly what you were blocked for in your unblock request won't help you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gardenstatelaw. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]