User talk:GarbageExpress

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Danny Tamberelli has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Danny Tamberelli was changed by GarbageExpress (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874168 on 2015-01-17T17:00:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Tamberelli with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 17:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bonnie Tyler, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bonnie Tyler was changed by GarbageExpress (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956835 on 2015-01-17T17:03:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bonnie Tyler. Orphan Wiki 17:05, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Okay, I'll stop now...}} GarbageExpress (talk) 17:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have already stopped, because I have blocked you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:08, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GarbageExpress (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fuck you

Decline reason:

Not for the love or money, darling. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GarbageExpress (talk) 17:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.