User talk:GameBoy789

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Kelly Kelly, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 23:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Kelly Kelly. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kelly Kelly. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pseudomonas_(talk) 00:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Kelly

Please do not add week by week details to the article of Kelly Kelly. Only matches that are notable in her overall career should be included. Furthermore, when adding information about aspects of ones personal life, a reliable source needs to be used. Otherwise, you are violating the WP:BLP policy. Wikipedia cannot be used as a reliable source as anyone can edit it. For a list of wrestling-related sites that have been found reliable, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Style guide#Sources. Nikki♥311 02:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for for edit warring and violations of the policy on living persons on Kelly Kelly. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -MBK₀₀₄ 02:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Kelly (2)

Please stop adding material to Kelly Kelly's page. The matches you keep adding are not notable to her overall career. In addition, the personal life claims you are making are either not backed up by a reliable source or are in violation or WP:YOUTUBE (youtube can't be used as a source for copyright purposes). Forums can also not be used as sources. If you continue to ignore warnings about this and edit war without discussing changes on her article's talk page, you could get blocked from editing. Thanks. Nikki♥311 02:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is your only warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Kelly Kelly, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Since you are a single-purpose account, continued editing in the pattern you have already edited under will result in an indefinite block.-MBK₀₀₄ 02:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for for continued single-purpose actions including disruptive editing by refusing to discuss contested edits, violating the BLP policy through either using no sources or sources of a dubious and/or non-reliable nature.. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -MBK₀₀₄ 23:19, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

GameBoy789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

72.153.191.180 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "GameBoy789". The reason given for GameBoy789's block is: "Disruptive editing: and BLP violations, [[WP:SPA|single-purpose accou

Blocking administrator: MBK004 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please unblock my account because I was only trying to make Kelly Kelly's wikipedia page but it was deletd everytime and I didn't understand the reasons and I tried to find reliable sources but according to wikipedia they weren't reliable.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GameBoy789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock my account I worked very hard on Kelly Kelly's wikipedia page and it took me two hours and then it was deleted just like that and the orange text that appeared saying I have a new message never appeared until now so I was not aware that I had warnings and it never said that youtube was not a reliable source until this message sign just appeared so please release the block on my account i promise I will try my best to find more reliable sources

Decline reason:

You've been blocked before for the same thing; you were warned repeatedly; you ignored the warnings, and persisted. What are we supposed to think? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GameBoy789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But I never saw this message page until now the thing that shows you that you have new messages never showed up before. I don't know if it was a glitch but I wasn't aware of the warnings because they never showed up

Decline reason:

I find that hard to believe, but in any event you were blocked before, and I assume you noticed that, and warnings are not a prerequisite for blocking. We made an effort to contact you, we cannot help it if you do not read the warnings. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GameBoy789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But it's true what am I supposed to do if my my computer had some type of glitch, I didn't know I was blocked before because I don't go on wikipedia everyday its only when I checked like 3 days later I saw that it had been deleted but I didn't know I had gotten banned and as I told you before I was unaware of a user page.

Decline reason:

Regardless of whether or not you knew of the warnings, you have given us no indication that you are not going to repeat the behavior in the future. Further spurious unblock requests might result in the removal of your ability to edit this page. lifebaka++ 21:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

None of this has anything to do with the actual reasons you were blocked - please review this guide for the sort of information we're looking for, primarily how you intend to avoid these problems in the future. Claiming ignorance of the warnings will not get you unblocked. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Besides: I don't go on wikipedia every day -- let's see...

Sure looks to me like you've been on Wikipedia every day, with full opportunity to see and understand the warnings you were being given. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GameBoy789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never was aware of the band because I didn't get a message I thought the page was getting deleted by other users or it wasn't saving properly I didn't mean any harm I am very sorry for the inconvieniance please take away the block from my account.

Decline reason:

I'm declining this request, because you still haven't addressed the reasons why you're blocked. I've also revoked your talk page access, due to an excessive amount of unblock requests. PhilKnight (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To request an unblock while appropriately addressing the reasons for your block, you can email us at: unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org.-MBK₀₀₄ 22:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]