User talk:Gajbireland

Gsv promotions

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Gsv promotions, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. ju66l3r 15:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nine ix lives, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wildthing61476 15:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nine ix lives

A tag has been placed on Nine ix lives, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 22:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nine ix lives

A tag has been placed on Nine ix lives, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jauerback 19:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:New Found Glory-Tip Of The Iceberg.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:New Found Glory-Tip Of The Iceberg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Griffith College Students' Union

The article Griffith College Students' Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With regret, no evidence that this passes WP:GNG - external coverage, independent sources, etc. No claim of notability, even implied. Even the SUs of more notable colleges (and Griffith is a solid mid-scale college at >9k students, no question) are often just covered in a section within the parent institution's article (separate legal status notwithstanding). It's not a bad start of an article, albeit too heavy with the tables of names, but I'm just not seeing how it rates an article at all, to date. If it is to stay, it will need better referencing as a minimum. Is there perhaps a book on the college with a decent section on the union?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SeoR (talk) 07:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]