Re. Midsomer Murders =

Thank you! As I said in my edit summary, I had no direct evidence that the John Barnaby character hadn't appeared in series 4, but it just seemed highly unlikely since the character was apparently only invented because they needed a replacement for John Nettles, and the chances of them having got an actor in a guest role to come and assume the lead twelve years later as the same character seemed extremely slim - I'm sure it's not unprecedented in the history of television, but if that HAD happened it would certainly be remarkable, and would require a great deal more sourced explanation than just a throwaway remark! So Neil Dudgeon was in series 4 as another character, eh? I wonder if that means in the Midsomer Murders universe old John Barnaby has a doppelgänger!

Incidentally, I agree with you on the point of the sidekick characters being referred to by their surnames. If you should notice it being re-reverted later on, give me a buzz, and I'll come on to the talk page for the article and help you establish a consensus on that point. I'll let you know likewise if I notice it, too. Lordrosemount (talk) 00:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Time Team

Hiya, Channel 4 own site has misleading informaiton ill try tracka source down that shows it wrong, i can assure you ther enot specials if you watch the epsiod ethere regular epsiodes special have titel credit at the beging TIME TEAM SPECIAL: special nameAndrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 17:40, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

generally you take the primary source as absoluteness but it better to use 3rd party realisable sources that have no affricative to the subject in this case time team, im a bit tied up just now but when i can find it i will post it on your page first so we can discuss rather than edit war. Basically primary sources can be deceptive because they can have there own agendgaAndrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 19:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gaiole. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gaiole. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gaiole. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]