User talk:Gahex220

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 20:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gahex220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't making "disruptive edits" Gahex220 (talk) 20:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

I think this situation might be salvageable by turning it into a partial block from the project and project talk namespaces since most of the edits that fit Just Step Sideways' description were there and the prior mainspace edits were vaguely reasonable (and honestly the prior state of the page could easily produce a misleading impression that what you did was more acceptable than it is), but we would at least need an unblock request that acknowledges the specifics of the situation and not just a platitude any blocked user could write. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what do u even mean your not making any sense Gahex220 (talk) 06:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrator note Adding my extended rationale from the block log: "user seems to be here to play games and screw around, not to help". If a reviewing admin would like more specific details those would be easy to provide. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 21:04, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not true, please do not spread misinformation about users Gahex220 (talk) 21:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Virgin of Caacupé moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Virgin of Caacupé. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyohei Hagiwara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyohei Hagiwara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyohei Hagiwara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]