User talk:GadzhevaMaya

Stoyan Gadjev

I'm not an admin, but I noticed that you wrote the page for Stoyan Gadjev. Although this is a worthwhile pursuit, it's not likely to get published. Someone not connected to the subject should be writing/editing the page. Likely the page won't get published. Consider putting in a request for another editor to write this. Sorry. Stix1776 (talk) 06:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stoyan Gadjev - translation from Bulgarian page

Hello,

Thank you for your comments. The page about Stoyan Gadjev is a translation from the Bulgarian page. Yes, I am his daughter; I also wrote the page in the Bulgarian wikipedia but it was accepted because Bulgaria is a small country and the page is written in a neutral tone with references. Additionally, still some communist influences exists in Bulgaria and some people envy that Stoyan Gadjev has written the only books of veterinary anatomy for universities in Bulgaria for many years at the international level, with bibliography, modern veterinary anatomical nomenclature and emphasis being placed on the applied nature of the anatomical data. There are no other books on topographic anatomy of domestic animals and anatomy of birds in Bulgaria at the moment, for many years. The only other books on systemic anatomy by another person (who still works in the uni, his last year) are just plain plagiarism as there are no bibliography and references at all. Unfortunately a lot of people are still afraid in Bulgaria. The same person and his friends tried to exclude my father's books from an almanac of the uni though they are mentioned of course in other almanacs. Furthermore not many people are familiar with wikipedia editing in general or have the relevant English language skills. I would appreciate it if the page gets published so I can connect the two pages in english and Bulgarian. Maya --GadzhevaMaya (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stoyan Gadjev (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Clearfrienda were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No puffery, and find some secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stoyan Gadjev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stoyan Gadjev, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend a ^💬 12:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GadzhevaMaya! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clear friend a ^💬 12:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stoyan Gadjev has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stoyan Gadjev. Thanks! Clear friend a ^💬 12:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Hello, I have explained in detail that I am his daughter and I had left a detailed message when I translated the article. I think the article is written in a very neutral way, it is the truth, it is the hard truth in a post communist country, with still communist influence. The references are the best scientific references available, university almanacs, scientific register, books, etc. Please delete what you do not like, or delete the whole translation, I do not care. It is a shame the wikipedia, especially the English wikipedia helps communists promote their agenda and teying to oppress people even when they have passed away. Pages in english wikipedia about old communists with very big details are kept just because somebody who is not related has written them, so ridiculous. Haven't you heard that there is fear in countires with dictatorships. Though 30 years have passed since end of communism in Eastern Europe, do you really think fear has gone, amd communists are not manipulsting still. A lot of these people are still alive and still working in universities, do you really think things have changed. Well, it has not. People are afraid and nobody will write it better and more neutral than me. They will read his books secretly because they are the only ones available in a small country like Bulgaria, but they will be afraid to write a wikipedia page about him. Anyway, things are even worse than I am saying it, but whatever. Certainly it is not puffery. It is the truth. It is ridiculous to say this. Since you do not understand how life is in such countires, no need to discuss more. You letting old propaganda using wikipedia to do new type of propaganda, such a shame. GadzhevaMaya (talk) 21:53, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stoyan Gadjev

Hello, GadzhevaMaya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stoyan Gadjev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]