User talk:GLutt5550

March 2022

Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Degtyaryov machine gun, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 11:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Degtyaryov machine gun, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 07:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mr.User200. I noticed that you added some information on the T-64 article, without citing a reliable source. You added a blogger-google content link and a self published source. Avoid using blogs, personal sites and newgsenerator sites. Please review the guidelines at WP:SPS and take this opportunity to add reliable references to the article. Thank you.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert and warning

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hi GLutt5550. Look, the WP:BURDEN (and WP:ONUS) to provide reliable sources is always on the editor introducing the information. Rarely if ever are exceptions made wrt to lowering the threshold of reliability. If anything it gets more severe in certain areas, like on medical pages or on The Holocaust in Poland. If you reviewed the first few links I provided but you still think you have a convincing case for a lowered threshold exception of some sort, you can present your argument at the Reliable sources noticeboard to see what participants there think. Incidentally, I'm pretty sure I've seen evidence of BMD-3 use during the invasion cited to a reliable source, but unfortunately, I can't recall where (possibly, it was actually RE: BMP-3, my memory is terrible). HTH. El_C 12:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]