User talk:GJFBR

Archives (index)

2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Welcome

Hello, Jean Franco, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —MRD2014 T C 18:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

June 2016

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hillsong Young & Free, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hillsong United (band), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You keep adding Planetshakers to the Associated Acts of several articles but you have neither offered any prose to support the association nor is there any clear association other than they play similar forms of music. If you cannot provide actual proof of an association between the groups, I will have to take the discussion to a larger group. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you linked https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=planetshakers, but that YouTube thinks they're stylistically similar does not mean that they have what the template, and project, suggest are appropriate. Please see Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts. "Groups that are merely similar" are not a valid association according to what's written there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on G12 Worship. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Fearless BND, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Also, none of the changes to that article are sourced. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Planetboom

Hello, GJFBR,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Planetboom should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planetboom .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Rosguill^talk 19:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nada es Imposible (Planetshakers album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Praise and worship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GJFBR. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sé Quién Eres Tú

The article Sé Quién Eres Tú has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM. Not nominated for a major award and no RSes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sé Quién Eres Tú for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sé Quién Eres Tú is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sé Quién Eres Tú until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You could go check the article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sé_Quién_Eres_Tú and see if the changes I made and reach an agreement Walter Görlitz. I would thank you enough.GJFBR (talk) 00:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is your problem with understanding that discussions should be had about articles on the article's talk page? Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

learn to read

If you want to discuss an article, do it at the article, not my talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can't avoid the RfD discussion by moving to draft space and removing the RfD. The discussion is going to happen with or without you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bethel Music en Español

Hello, GJFBR,

Thanks for creating Bethel Music en Español! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on the album "Bethel Music en Español", though I recommend adding text from pro reviews and other media coverage, if any can be found.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Legado

Hello, GJFBR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Legado".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 00:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleluya (En La Tierra) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleluya (En La Tierra) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleluya (En La Tierra) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A loose necktie (talk) 23:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Legacy (Planetshakers album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Producer, Acoustic, Bass and Mastering

Nada es Imposible (Planetshakers album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Producer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

English titles

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Draft:S%C3%A9_Qui%C3%A9n_Eres_T%C3%BA&curid=58093064&diff=918398364&oldid=918025089 You might want to look into the extra column, and be sure to quote the English song titles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note

When you excerpt reviews to support notability, only quote selected phrases, not entire paragraphs. DS (talk) 20:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Correct titles of articles and uploading covers

Hi. Firstly, please do not put a full stop at the end of "Part". It is not correct; the sources on the Planetshakers album articles you started all either say "Part" or "Pt.", not "Part." Titles of articles, unless it's a universally used title, should not state "Part." anything. Also, please stop claiming that you are the author or have free license to distribute the album covers. You don't, as you don't own them, hence why they keep being deleted. I'm surprised you haven't been warned or even blocked from uploading on Commons yet. Commons does not allow fair use album covers. You should be uploading them directly to Wikipedia with the appropriate license—that of fair use, not that you are the author and free to distribute the cover when you're not. If you continue uploading these covers, I will point an admin to them. Learn how to use the proper license and where to upload fair use images. Thank you. Ss112 03:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heaven On Earth album Planetshakers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heaven On Earth album Planetshakers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Passion album Planetshakers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Passion album Planetshakers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Legado album Planetshakers.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Legado album Planetshakers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Heaven On Earth album Planetshakers.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Heaven On Earth album Planetshakers.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Minorax (talk) 15:32, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GJFBR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a mistake in creating and deleting an empty article through another account. However, I feel it is an exaggeration of the one-month blockade.

Decline reason:

This doesn't provide a reason why you think your use of multiple accounts was permitted under WP:SOCK and doesn't show where you disclosed your use of alternate accounts. Note that your use may have been legitimate, but you haven't established it yet. Yamla (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GJFBR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I already understood the rules of wikipedia, but I still think that it is an exaggeration the 1-month block should be considered with a warning before doing so unaware that it was a wikipedia policy to use another account. I'm so sorry I learned the lesson.

Decline reason:

A 1 month block is pretty generous. Typically, abusing multiple accounts will earn an indefinite block. SQL ^{Query me!} 19:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GJFBR (talk) 03:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Be warned, you are in danger of having your block extended significantly. You seem to be saying you knew your actions were wrong ("I already understood the rules of Wikipedia") but deliberately violated them. And then you were surprised you were blocked instead of just being given a warning, despite knowing your actions were inappropriate. If this is the case, why on earth should you ever be unblocked? Why on earth shouldn't we extend your block indefinitely? --Yamla (talk) 12:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First, there is no way the socking with the named account was legitimate, whether the user "knew the rules" or didn't. It was pretty obnoxious shenanigans on the user's part. Second, in addition to the registered account socking, the user edited while logged out in an abusive way. Perhaps one month was too lenient, but it certainly wasn't too harsh.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi

	help with some albums
	i need you to help me in some albums of isabel pantoja that's not has info.. thanks Tito5918 (talk) 03:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Legado album Planetshakers.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Legado album Planetshakers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Planetshakers musicians

A tag has been placed on Category:Planetshakers musicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Planetshakers

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Planetshakers. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of refs

Hi - regarding New Life Worship - I just removed a bunch of citations from the article which you added after my review. I guess you're aware of this already, but just in case, the standard of source we look for is at WP:RS. Some of those looked like fairly random fan sites or blogs; there were also a couple of links to Spotify, which as a commercial and promotional website we should definitely avoid linking to. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 18:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK thank you very much Cheers _(blether), for helping me in the article New Life Worship, Thank you.GJFBR (talk) 01:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm confused - this account is Jean Franco, but the account editing that article is GJFBR, which redirects here. What's the story with the two accounts - can you confirm that you are the person currently editing from GJFBR please? Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 18:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I confirm that it is me, I will explain to you GJFBR are my initials of my full names, but Jean Franco is my name that is why you saw my name, but do not worry I already fixed it as you can see here [1] in my presentation there it says.GJFBR (talk) 01:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joth Hunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Fear Not, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I Remember (Studio Version).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Remember (Studio Version).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:All I Can Say.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All I Can Say.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jesus Over Everything (Single).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jesus Over Everything (Single).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lemme Tell Ya (single).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lemme Tell Ya (single).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Run to You (Planetboom song).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Run to You (Planetboom song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I've noticed your contributions to Spanish-language Christian music and thought you might be interested. Erick (talk) 05:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Evan Craft

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Evan Craft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.newreleasetoday.com/artistdetail.php?artist_id=3843. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Planetshakers Kids -.Nothing Is Impossible.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Planetshakers Kids -.Nothing Is Impossible.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Planetshakers Kids album Nothing Is Impossible.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Planetshakers Kids album Nothing Is Impossible.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]