User talk:GANI7199
March 2024
[edit]Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Edit warring at Sylhet Division, at your service.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
GANI7199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I dont understand why I have been blocked, I requested an appeal and overlook my case. I have not performed any abuse in Wikipedia!. Some one help!
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:47, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
GANI7199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
blocked for persistent sock puppetry, not on disruptive edits but mostly on edit wars but. Being new, I am not intend to disrupt here, rather learn and contribute and yes no intention of WP:ILLEGIT, but did maintain to WP:SCRUTINY. Now I am avoiding edit wars and will learn the steps of editors interactions and coordination also keeping in check of WP:5P4. Now judgment are on you guys.
Decline reason:
Utter nonsense. A clear violation of WP:SOCK. You personally are blocked. You are not welcome to edit until your original account is unblocked. Yamla (talk) 16:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Yamla Why don't you un-revoking edit own talk page in COLTashrif1499. GANI7199 16:30 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- No. WP:UTRS is available to you. Your block evasion here will count significantly against you, though, demonstrating clearly it would be a mistake to unblock you. I'll go and modify the block here to match that on your original block. --Yamla (talk) 16:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)