Jump to content

User talk:G-Toasty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, G-Toasty! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan The Man (March 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 05:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, G-Toasty! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 05:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Liance Okay. I can work with this, but on the topic of YouTube, those videos are official, and are where the developer primarily provides information about the story. G-Toasty (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey G-Toasty. At first glance I would say that the subject you are writing is notable considering coverage on Metacritic, and it would be able to pass WP:NGAME so I encourage you to keep working on the draft. Just make sure to cite those sources to meet the notability criteria.
As for your question about YT videos, we tend to avoid citing YouTube as non-user generated sources are preferred but if the videos are reliable (in this case, published by the developer) then they are OK. Generally gameplay and plot summary does not need citations so long as they do not state any contentious material, but citing the videos is fine. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 01:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Liance It very much does, thanks you so much G-Toasty (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi G-Toasty! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Notability for (draft) article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan The Man (March 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 11:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan the Man has been accepted

[edit]
Dan the Man, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Wanted articles" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wanted articles and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 21#Wanted articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]