User talk:Futureofworkandleadership

Hello, Futureofworkandleadership. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 01:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizebeth Varghese (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://elizebethvarghese.squarespace.com/about-1. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Elizebeth Varghese may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Futureofworkandleadership! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Elizebeth Varghese. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That you should create a draft consisting of material copied from the internet is perhaps understandable in a new user, even though there's a clear warning against it in the edit window; that you should re-create it after it's been deleted is not. Also you've received a clear warning about promotional editing on this page, and have chosen to ignore it. If you're interested in making useful contributions to this project on topics not connected to your own activities then do please request an unblock; if all you want to do is promote Elizebeth Varghese then you might as well save yourself the time and effort. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justlettersandnumbers,

I have a few clarifying questions. So if I omit the book review section and properly cite the image then Elizebeth's page would be approved? Is the book review section what is being flagged as promotional editing? Futureofworkandleadership (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]