User talk:Fusehall

Welcome!

Hello, Fusehall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Star Mississippi 20:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Incredible93 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Incredible93. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusehall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

there has been some misunderstanding, I am a "mall editor" from Albany,NY I'm however not incredible93. I obey rules and have not to my knowledge done anything wrong. I've been recently trying to improve malls in New York state and focus on a more positive tone. I understand incredible 93 was a mall editor however I don't think I've been accurately blocked because it's not likely they live around me.Fusehall (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the SPI. You don't have to be physically anywhere near another person to be socking. This could also be meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusehall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm just a mall editor wanting to improve wikipedia I'm not incredible93 and am not violating policy. I'm not sure exactly what I'm accused of doing and would like to know so I could defend myself. I have respect for this website and it's faculty and am more than happy to abide by the rules. Thank you. Fusehall (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 20:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusehall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm Incredible93 I was only hiding that because I didn't know how to appeal before which I should've because Incredible93 was ONLY blocked for possessing multiple accounts which doesn't violate policy. I'm appealing because I have done NOTHING wrong but posses multiple accounts. Fusehall (talk) 21:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are violating WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Your only option for a potential unblock is the standard offer.Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

>

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fusehall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Incredible93 was unfairly banned which is why I'm appealing. Incredible93 was only blocked for possessing multiple accounts which doesn't break any rules.Fusehall (talk) 21:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

no. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:13, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Revoked talk page access as a total waste of time.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]