User talk:Funny editorz

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Funny editorz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok sorry please unblock me I will not do it again

Decline reason:

No. Apply at your primary account. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:56, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You will not do what again ? Can you also tell us what your former account was ? - Peripitus (Talk) 09:44, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

no just unblock me please--Funny editorz (talk) 09:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are already blocked at your other account. Atttempting to edit here is block evasion; this account will not be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:56, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question, Peripitus, in his incarnation as Funny userz he was editing comments at RfA by substituting his name in comments made by reputable editors; as he has also done using this account. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Anthony Bradbury Lol there are soo many more Sockpuppets ranging back to November 2013 but I'm not going to tell you who the master is.-Funny editorz (talk) 12:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If we need to find out I expect we can. If we don't need to why should we bother? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]