User talk:Ftx9923

January 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

those were pin point accurate corrections , shah mir dynasty is a kashmiri dynasty all of shah mirs family members were kashmiris they married kashmiris , they spoke kashmiri , what does he has to do with gibari, jahangiri and swati rulers 🤣🤣 i also heard some pashtuns of swat claiming shah mir dynasty their , swatis ruled kashmir for 300 year wtf lun mera , according to most accurate sources he was chanravanshi and his family members now use shah miri surname i even know a guy he has this surname they are literally kashmiri rajpoot and they are very few in number , WHY the fuck you guys attaching him with gibari , jahangiri and swati rulers Ftx9923 (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 03:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

chutiya sala Ftx9923 (talk) 04:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sultanate of Swat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 11:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In light of the edit summary on this edit, I want to remind you that Wikipedia is a collaborative project. If you are going to take that sort of hostile, aggressive tone toward fellow editors, you run the risk of losing your editing privileges. —C.Fred (talk) 11:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary aside, it's your fourth revert to that article, so you crossed the brightline. —C.Fred (talk) 11:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 12:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]