Jump to content

User talk:Fritz Jörn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Fritz Jörn! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 08:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Proper disambiguation

[edit]

Hello.

I am here about your contribution #676730401 in Bower (software) article. I am afraid it was rather sloppy and I had no choice but to undo it. For how we do disambiguation in Wikipedia, you can study Wikipedia:Disambiguation §§ Is there a primary topic?​ and Disambiguation page or hatnotes? but in summary, articles whose titles have disambiguating suffixes like "(software)" do not require any disambiguation.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Lisa, I realize my entry was unusual. I use the English Wikipedia to learn English, and had not known the word bower. My fried Peterson had translated Die Gartenlaube in his book with bower, not as you do with Garden arbor. Looking for bower I had wound up with this piece of software, and felt that a the entry "Bower (software)" looked like an ad for the software, and it might have needed a disambiguation or some sort of back link right from the start. In fact there is a disambiguation for bower! Why not let the reader of "software" know that? Later I went to Pergola, and had found what I had looked for, but with no mention of »bower« there. Perhaps the word bower ought to b added to the pergola entry? Thank you and nice greetings from Germany! – Fritz Jörn (talk) 11:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Ritten (61).JPG

[edit]

You uploaded or restored , File:Ritten (61).JPG, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.

When you have copmpleted the above steps: to indicate that you've accepted the given the license shown, and updated the file description page appropriately.

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Womanizer (January 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Fritz Jörn! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Womanizer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Womanizer

[edit]

Hello, Fritz Jörn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Womanizer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 06:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Wikipedia managers. "Womanizer" gives 16.2 Million hits with Google, try and see. In the German Wikipedia the Womanizer as device is pictured and called a vibrator, see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Womanizer last entry. Not so in the English version https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Womanizer. In the German Vibrator entry the device is shown (Succionador.png) and called a »Druckwellenvibrator zur Stimulation der Klitoris mithilfe von kurzen Saugreizen in schneller Folge« (“pressure wave vibrator to stimulate the clitoris using short suction impulses in rapid succession”). The thing is a German patent. If you think the vibrator is not worth explaining to the English reader, I won’t interfere. Frankly I’m disappointed with your policy, that only published articles count, and not simple facts. – Fritz Jörn (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]