User talk:Frienlifer

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have a bad feeling you are Societyfinalclubs, back again while blocked to make a point. Whether I am correct or not, please be aware of our policy on Edit warring. Discuss this, calmly, on the article talk page. If you keep reverting back and forth, you'll be blocked (again?). --barneca (talk) 03:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for edit warring. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Societyfinalclubs tried to write an artcile about purdue that was removed before by vote as a hoax before. I am removing everything that I think is not legit. It is better to be safe than sorry- less is better than more if we just don't know. We can not trust homepages about groups. They must be 3rd party sourcing.Frienlifer (talk) 03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We can not have groups that we don't know for sure even if they are legit- it is too much of a risk, and high school frats do not belong here period- it does not pertain to the article topic.They must go.Frienlifer (talk) 03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also Ma Wan Da andthe others are honor societies not secret- they should go too.Frienlifer (talk) 03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page should be cleaned of background fluff- and just hav ewhat is relevant.03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

After your block expires please bring these concerns to the talk page and seek consensus before making changes. Just because Societyfinalclub created an article that was deleted previously because people believed it was a hoax does not be any means indicate that all of his/her edits were in bad faith. If an article created by societyfinalclub does not meet standards please use WP:AFD to get it deleted than remove it from the list on the secret society page. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 04:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Societyfinalclubs for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. barneca (talk) 18:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]