User talk:Freqrexy
|
I try to enforce them too. I'm just stopping by but I'll be out again. --Addict 2006 13:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Wrong pronoun
[edit]Sorry, you didn't have a userpage to look on, so I just sort of went with my natural assumption. I feel your pain though...my userpage is pink and I still get mistaken for a guy. ♠PMC♠ 21:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Mike Read
[edit]Please see the Mike Read talk page regarding Rolf Mayo's crap attempts at humour by vandalising the article. Much of it revolves around a piss-take of Read's use (as far as I can tell, or care) of the word "feasible". The tagging was clearly bad faith. Fourohfour 19:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
well...
[edit]well dude i don't know what one is chould you help imean amate in wiki is a good thing Kingdom of crash and spyro —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdom of crash and spyro (talk • contribs) 15:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- dont tell me u agree with cb fan im just trying to help people all in the country any problm we have im sorry --Kingdom of crash and spyro 14:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC).
- You're vandalising. I'm sorry, but you are. You continually post rubbish information about Spyro having a crush on Coco (and continuously in the wrong threads, which doesn't help), you ignore warnings (you were warned about your Crash picture numerous times, and you refused), you write like a two year old (No capital letters, no punctuation, no proper spelling of ANYTHING), you refuse to take good advice (related to the former, I suggested you use a spellchecker to go through your work, yet you refused), you tell lies (Enough Said) and the fact that you really think that people will make someone who is all of these a Mod is pathetic (especially as you did ALL of the above points within them, AND didn't do it properly). Seriously, you've got to stop. Blaming Freqrexy for things you've done is just telling even more lies, AND it shows what you're really like. CBFan 17:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- when did i say that i don't remember but my bro does think coco and spyro whould be good 2gether.--Kingdom of crash and spyro 15:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC).
- Your brother's an interesting person, I give you that now. :P Besides, that's just fan speculation, not something that gets taken into canon. Freqrexy 15:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- i asced him & yes it was him who put it on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.196.19 (talk) 09:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Your brother's an interesting person, I give you that now. :P Besides, that's just fan speculation, not something that gets taken into canon. Freqrexy 15:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Kingdom of Spyro and Crash needs reporting.
[edit]KOSAC is STILL posting that image for no reason. The guy needs reporting, as you said you would. CBFan 14:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've done the report, and on top of that I'm doing everything I can by passing the word to as many problem investigators as I can find here. It may take a few days before we can get a response, but I'm sure something will come through. It seems as if we're getting a start with him receiving a 3RR warning, the deletion of that image and a day-long protection for the article though.Freqrexy 20:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Crash image and other involved editors
[edit]Regarding this comment: please, just keep a cool head and back off from the guy. I'd rather not see the disagreement escalate again. All we need do is perform the necessary reverts (keeping WP:3RR in mind), and the unusable image will eventually be deleted; as indicated here, an admin has undertaken to deal with that image page in a more permanent manner. Cheers. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 16:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- I understand what you're saying, though even if I do back off he'd keep finding ways to attempt to flood over Wikipedia. It's one thing to troll another member, upload an image that doesn't fit the non-free image criterion and apply to be an administrator, but the deletion of content (which as stated was a reason why CBFan got a block) looked a little disturbing. Nevertheless, I'll see if I can cool off and hope Espio's da man and Kingdom of crash and spyro (whom I am convinced are the exact same person) understand Wiki's policies on a higher level than they do now. Freqrexy 17:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
id just like to say sorry about everything
[edit]i never ment to do anything roung i just didn't understand wat i was doin roung--Kingdom of crash and spyro 12:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC).
- Applying for adminship to be a "cop" is wrong. Constantly putting up an image even after being given reasons against it is also wrong. I'll be nice with you again if you stop putting that image up; a Paint edit job does not mean better quality, take it from experience from someone with a degree in Computing. Freqrexy 12:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- aculy me and espio arn't he's irish im english jus so you know.--Kingdom of crash and spyro 10:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC).
- According to Espio, you two "knew each other at school". I'm still suspecting sockpuppetry, even though you insist that you aren't the same. Freqrexy 10:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- aculy me and espio arn't he's irish im english jus so you know.--Kingdom of crash and spyro 10:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC).
well were not he moved from irishia(thats were irish peps come from right) to england.--Kingdom of crash and spyro 15:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC).
- Sorry to say it to you, but if you can't even get the whole country of where Irish people come from, then I'm still suspecting sockpuppetry. o_O Freqrexy 16:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
what does sockpupitry mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdom of crash and spyro (talk • contribs) 14:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- It means having to create multiple accounts for the purpose of using them to support yourself. Hence, the extra accounts are treated as "sock puppets" in which you can manipulate them to your own liking. Freqrexy 15:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
hm.well no i dont do that "sockpupetry" thing,ok --Kingdom of crash and spyro 14:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC).
Cropping
[edit]Strictly speaking, #2 of unacceptable image use doesn't forbid cropping per se; it's more there assert that one couldn't use a portion of an image which is related to one subject in order to illustrate an article not directly related. There are, in fact, suitable cases when cropping is desirable from the POV of WP:NFCC #3 (b) ("The entire work is not used if a portion will suffice.").
However, in the case of Image:Crash titans 4.PNG, the rather amateurish nature of the cropping, to my mind, makes it unsuitable for encyclopaedic purposes. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 15:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well I knew from the beginning that the cropping looked amateurish, giving me instant doubts over the image placement within an online encyclopedia. That and the fact that the original image did not at all need replacing had me concerned over its use. But thanks for the clarification on the cropping rule; I'll take that into consideration. Freqrexy 16:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
dont worry dude
[edit]im not but id be careful as soon as titans comes out millions of fans are gonna start doin it just saying. im not sure if im logged in its messed up for some reason.kingdom
- Then I'm just going to be on hand to revert their image attempts back if they ever do that. I doubt that "millions" of people would do the same rough cropping job that you tried to pull off o_O Freqrexy 19:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thanks for helping dude --Kingdom of crash and spyro 17:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC).
X Factor nightmare!
[edit]Thanks for trying to fix my mistake, it wasn't my fault, honest! I guess we're both mess-ups ;) anemone|projectors 20:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
ok
[edit]i will not pu cm on cttr links,but now its like wen i edit its removed--Kingdom of crash and spyro 11:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Rescue Uka Uka.
[edit]Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uka Uka. Someone wants Uka Uka's article deleted for no apparant reason whatsoever. Feel free to post your opinions. CBFan (talk) 11:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Kingdom of crash and spyro
[edit]There is absolutely no reason for you to replace the content on this page. There is no reason why an editor can't blank their own talk page. Please revert yourself. --Onorem♠Dil 05:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Blanking is just fine, but to state explicitly "I've quit" (lol at the bad grammar) is actually a poor example of showing that someone "was" a coherent user to the community at all. That's what worries me if anything. Freqrexy (talk) 09:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ctr boxart.png
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Ctr boxart.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)