User talk:Frendraught

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Frendraught, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! HeartofaDog (talk) 09:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles from Boase

Regarding the articles you are adding from Boase, thank you for taking the trouble. Could you also format them in accordance with the Wikipedia Guidelines on How to Edit an Article and Wikipedia:Guide to Layout? This makes them a great deal more useful and accessible. Thanks. HeartofaDog (talk) 09:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with the formatting and categories here, but I will try my best - afterwards. For now I have to add hundreds of Boases articles (by the way, he died in 1897, they are all in the public domain now) and my time to do this is very limited. So I have to do this first. Greetinx, Frendraught 09:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you getting the text from / why are you concentrating on G. C. Boase? The best source I've found for DNB is the Internet Archive ... but you'd have to thread through all 65 or so volumes to get your Boases. --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.oxforddnb.com/ - They've got the "old" DNB articles, which are in the public domain, in their archive. I am concentrating on GC Boase because his articles are not outdated. The new ODNB itself recycles them with very little correction. --Frendraught 09:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh. I've been scraping badly OCRd text. But help me out: I cannot fathom the ODNB user interface sufficiently to find the DNB entries. If you would, take Renton Nicholson, for instance. Where is he on ODNB (or, rahter, where is his DNB entry)? (Yes, I am logged into that site). thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Open the person's entry you are looking for and you will find a link "DNB Archive" on the left side of your screen, in the yellow navigation area. A click will open a new smaller window. (javascript required). Voila. --Frendraught 09:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doh. As you wrote, I spotted it. Well, I take my hat off to you, a) for adding so much from DNB b) for showing me a better way than scraping Internet Archive and c) for doing all of this despite having died in 1650. I guess at least you'll have stopped smelling by now :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My father died in 1650. I'm still alive, I'm the Highlander. ;-) --Frendraught 09:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Edwin John James, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://books.google.com/books?id=Wt2OHg8EFjwC&pg=PA206&lpg=PA206&dq=%22dealing+with+common+juries+he+freely+appealed+with+conspicuous+success+to+their+ignorance%22&source=web&ots=l1QKwOosfj&sig=VLq0MA_mEByx-jw7FI5ZlKOVEqY. As a copyright violation, Edwin John James appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Edwin John James has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Edwin John James and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Edwin John James with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Edwin John James.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. WWGB 10:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider rethinking. The author of this text died 1897. The text is in the public domain. --Frendraught 10:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I've never seen Special:Newpages without one of your articles from Boase. Thank you very much for taking the time to contribute so much. east.718 at 16:48, 10/30/2007

Unspecified source for Image:Oliver,_Martha_Cranmer_(1834-1880),_by_Herbert_Watkins,_late_1850s.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oliver,_Martha_Cranmer_(1834-1880),_by_Herbert_Watkins,_late_1850s.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 10:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Farrar

I reverted your move from John Farrar to John Farrar (musician). When you do moves such as these, please check Special:Whatlinkshere and fix any existing inbound links, else they just point to the disambig page. —Moondyne 00:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in

Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/DNB. Or not. --Tagishsimon (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation, but my ODNB-subscription is closed since 2 November and I can't afford the fee for another month. I have no library subscription and have to pay for it myself. --Frendraught 18:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Found this - the ODNB isn't the focus, and what we're doing is to proof-read the old, public-domain DNB to make it more available, and place its content suitably edited into articles here. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:G Bradshaw.jpg

Hi, you uploaded a new version of this image 2 years ago, and I was just wondering where you got the new version. It looks like it is from a source newer than 100 years old, and as such, would not be under public domain. (X! · talk) · @079 · 00:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Robert Durie Osborn

I have nominated Robert Durie Osborn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Durie Osborn. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BrianY (talk) 16:54, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clutterbuck, Henry (1767-1856), by John Cochran, pubd 1840 (after Henry Room).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clutterbuck, Henry (1767-1856), by John Cochran, pubd 1840 (after Henry Room).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Oliver, Martha Cranmer (1834-1880), by Herbert Watkins, late 1850s.jpg

The file File:Oliver, Martha Cranmer (1834-1880), by Herbert Watkins, late 1850s.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]