User talk:Freidster

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Freidster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i wish an apology from user bwilkins who is an operative editor of wikipedia. This users hss posted on my psge that i am not adult, a psge accesdible by all. This may hsve career and family implications for me. This is slanderous and i am within my right to ask for this to be removed and given a formal apology

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time. Max Semenik (talk) 20:45, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Freidster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i did not thresten legal action due to content but due to the slanderous remarks lrft on my page . I am within my right to do this under the defamation act 1996 (dcotland)

Decline reason:

Since you used your talk page to make further legal threats while blocked, you've just lost the ability to edit it. You may direct further appeals to WP:UTRS but as long as you stick to your current attitude you have no chance of being unblocked. Max Semenik (talk) 20:45, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As long as you threaten legal action against Wikipedia or one of its editors, you will not be allowed to edit until the legal action is resolved or the threat withdrawn. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]