User talk:FredericaMG

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, FredericaMG. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Frederica Mathewes-Green, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Guerillero. Someone unknown created a Wikipedia page for me long ago, and it has long had a note saying that it needs more citations. There was nothing else in the original entry to cite, so I added more details and linked to them.

I'm not selling anything, and I'm not doing anything controversial. I'm self-employed (a writer). I'm just completing the original entry, fleshing it out with more detail. 2600:6C5C:6800:32DF:7D23:5423:7CDD:48D0 (talk) 22:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template gets at most of what I was trying to get across. Writing about yourself is discouraged for a variety of reasons. -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, by "the template," do you mean this page, "Managing a conflict of interest"?

I understand why Wikipedia needs to have rules in place, so that someone doesn't bend an entry to reflect a bias--especially when there is a controversy involved.

Tell me how we can accomplish what we need to do: the original entry was very short, and it needed more citations. Since I'm the person with the dates, titles, etc, I seemed to be the most knowledgeable person to update it. Is there another way to solve this problem?

There's no controversy, and no money to be made. I'm almost 70 and summing up my career. FredericaMG (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After sleeping on it, I can see that the whole tone is off (in what I wrote). Perhaps you could select whatever you think is relevant from it, to flesh out the earlier version some more.

I wasn't sure what "needs more citations" means but I guessed it meant there needed to be more links & footnotes? Which required there to be more content (things I'd done) that citations could be given for. FredericaMG (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]