Jump to content

User talk:Frederic1995

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Frederic1995, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Power Rangers article changes

[edit]

Hi there. I've seen that you made several changes to the power rangers articles over the past few days. It is not necessary to change Saban Entertainment to Saban International. And it is also a violation of our manual of style to use the flag icons in info boxes. Please refrain from making these changes in the future.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using the Spanish name of Los Angeles when you add the location information to the articles, not to mention you do not have a source that it is LA.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use {{USA}} In the info boxes. There is no need to have the flag. Do not add a "co-producers" parameter because it doesn't work. Do not add the network where the episodes were rerun on. This is not what is important for he templates. Stop editing the Power Rangers pages like this. This is your final warning. If you institute another wide range of bad edits to these pages you may be blocked.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:28, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not provide a link to United States please. It is common enough that it is not necessary, nor is it particularly relevant to the pages.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Power Rangers S.P.D.
added a link pointing to John Laing

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm Ryulong. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reordering the cast sections. Stop adding links to United States. Stop removing red links to pages that don't yet exist.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Power Rangers Megaforce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Laing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

[edit]

Hi, your edits here, here, here, here, and here don't appear constructive to me, since it looks like you're randomly changing the order of the characters. If you are organizing them by some rational means, for instance, the way the characters are credited in the series, (See MOS:TV) then you need to let other editors know that by including coherent edit summaries. Since you are not explaining your edits, it appears that you are changing the order arbitrarily or per personal bias, which is not what the Wikipedia community is interested in. Please don't reorder content without explaining your rationale, and please be sure that your edits confirm with the Manual of Style for Television. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Power Rangers Ninja Storm. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Credits should always be listed as actor first, character second, i.e. "John Smith as Red Ranger". DonIago (talk) 21:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may have noticed that I had to revert a number of your edits because you added IMDb as a reference.([1][2][3]) Per WP:RS/IMDB, WP:TVFAQ and WP:USERG, IMDb is not considered a reliable source. The same goes for sites like Wikia, TV.com, TVTropes, and even Wikipedia itself. Please use published sources, like web news sites, books, magazines, etc. And for something as uncontroversial as this, you could even use the production company's website as a reference. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] All of these edits contain unsourced content that appears to be a duplicate of unsourced content submitted earlier today by 190.247.244.3. This could be construed as disruptive, since I suspect you edited while logged-out, then resubmitted the same content after it had been reverted. Do not submit this content again please without references, as it will be considered disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've addressed your note on my talk page. You still have not sufficiently added references to the article. If you are unwilling to do that, the content may be reverted. Please read my comments first so you can understand what is and isn't a suitable source for this information. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. If you continue to edit while logged-out, you may be indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. Take this as the final warning. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Frederic1995. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Frederic1995. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Saban Entertainment. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Modernponderer (talk) 09:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Frederic1995. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]