User talk:FrantShiftSoap

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Padlokasul (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

September 2012

Hello, I'm Kilopi. Your recent edit to the page Curly Wurly appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kilopi (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Curly Wurly. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2012 (UTC) If you take the liberty of comparing the article with the available sources (including the Talk page), you will find that almost the entire article lacks sources. As I said to another editor a few minutes ago, feel free to delete the bulk of the article for the same reason you deleted my edit. We wouldn't want any double standards, would we?FrantShiftSoap (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Curly Wurly. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 18:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, are we having literacy problems? Do try and read what is written above. If you really have such a problem with verifiability, I draw your attention to the fact that almost the entirety of the article has no sources, either external or mentioned on the talk page (or even in the edit summaries). Delete the majority of the article if you wish, but you seem to be applying the 'verifiability policy' in a hypocritical way.FrantShiftSoap (talk) 19:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Curly Wurly

Good reading: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 22:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]