User talk:Franklove

{{hang on }} I don't understand shakespeare fan 00 when he says that this is not an agency, what kind of administrator is this, it seems as if his mind is in the gutter or somthing, what is he thinking about the whore he was with last night? no one is asking for agency services, just for this artist judith to get the recognition she deserves and is being denied by shakespearefan 00

Also, this is an independent artist, lets stop this corporate hating, hey shakespeare, which record label do you work for? seems like you are trying to erase this artist from wikipedia

Everything that I put up about judith is deleted or erased and I wonder why?

Didn't know that she was loved and admired and envied so much

Somehow, i know if Judith were one of the cussing rappers, she could easily get a bio on here, its just no room for positive music, every song must be somthing negative and degrading, especially when it comes to black women

==Fair use rationale for Image:Judith_Mitchell_Eni_Mini_Mighty_Moe!.jpg==

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work:

To illustrate the subject in question
Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information
On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights.
Fair use

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.
This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work:

To illustrate the subject in question
Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information
On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights.
Fair use

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.
This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

the use of this image is fair because the artist is giving me permission to upload her content this image is available worldwide on www.cdbaby.com/judithonline2 www.judithonline.net www.myspace.com/judithonline everywhere but on here

meanwhile, wikipedia is too complicated, it needs to be simplified everything on this site is not understandable, it gives the impression of persons who just want to be smart, but in actuality, really aren't that bright

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Judith_Mitchell_Eni_Mini_Mighty_Moe!.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

there goes the plantation driver shakespeare again, picking at this artist this is a very talented young lady and she deserves her article on here stop hating shakespeare

==Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg==

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work:

To illustrate the subject in question
Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information
On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights.
Fair use

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.
This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Sources: www.cdbaby.com/judithonline2

Judith Mitchell

Copyright Info: Copyright March 2006 Copyright#SRU0030098

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg, by ShakespeareFan00 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

WP:Not an agency

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The blurb you added to the image description read like a release a talent agency might put out, Wikipedia is NOT

a 'talent' agency. Judith is very anti talent agency, in fact, she is against "ownership" completely. a talent agency deals with models and actresses, not singers. Now, the content I read about singers who have their bio up, sounds just like a record label promoting their artist. So, if the price is right, anyone can put up a bio about a singer right? ShakespeareFan00 11:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free media information and use rationale true – NEEDS ARTICLE NAME
Description	album cover
Source	www.cdbaby.com/judithonline
Article	No article specified. Please edit this file description and add the name of the article the file is used in. (get help with syntax)
Portion used	100%
Low resolution?	10x12
Purpose of use	acknowledgement
Replaceable?	no 0%
Other information	released in 2006
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of [[{{{Article}}}]]//wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Franklovetrue

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Judith Mitchell The Hardest Part Album small.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg. The copy called Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 11:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou Staeckerbot!

Theres a thing called demon running around and making threats on wikipedia and then calling persons of color, "uncivil". how double edged

This thing needs to be locked up immediately for spreading censorship and then having the audasidy to accuse the righteous of being uncivil, with a name like demon, one can only imagine its real purpose for wikipedia.

Meanwhile, it is openly gay and a student! Think it has a lot more growing to do, if you get my wift

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for making personal attacks, both on and off wiki. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Franklove (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Demon is targeting me for blocking because he emailed me saying that he was going to defend Shakespearefan00 at all costs for any comment he didn't approve of

Decline reason:

Your comments have been quite inappropriate and I would have blocked you myself if demon didn't do it first. Please read policies like WP:CIVIL before you come back. — Metros 12:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.