User talk:Francisco-gonzalez-2019

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Francisco-gonzalez-2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, my name is Valeria La Maestra. I’m a graphic and web designer from Buenos Aires, Argentina. I’ve been working with clients for 13 years and I’ve never had any issues. I´ll paste the link to my Linkedin profile, so you can check my credentials and recommendations from clients: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vlamaestra/ You’ll see that I’m an honest professional and I can assure you that I have no intention to break any rule. Two of my clients: Francisco Gonzalez and Adriana Calhoon asked me to create an article in Wikipedia to inform who they are, where they come from and describe their career. That’s why I create different accounts, one for each client, like I always do, to have the information organized. I’m so sorry because I didn’t know that creating multiple accounts was against the rules, so I present my apologies for doing it. In order to defend the content of the articles, I´d like to say that my intention was to inform (who they are, their roots from another country and how they built their careers, like an inspirational speech), not to do self-promotion. When I read that Wikipedia´s moderators considered Adriana Calhoon´s profile a way of self-promotion, I decided to create a new account and change the content of the article (in order to accomplish the task that my client asked me). As a web designer is a common procedure: to try another way to solve an issue creating a new account. So I built an account called Ac-mediatv-2019 to start over. Wikipedia banned again the content, so I thought that a way to solve it was to start from the scratch creating another account (this new one is called Vlamaestra) and rewrite the article (It was deleted too). This is my first time working in Wikipedia platform and I didn’t know that this common procedure in web design was considered against the rules by Wikipedia. I hope that you could reconsider the situation and allow me to use the accounts Adriana Calhoon and Francisco-gonzalez-2019 to rebuild the articles. I commend myself to read conscientiously the rules and follow them step by step. Francisco-gonzalez-2019 (talk) 21:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dloh cier ekim 03:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Francisco-gonzalez-2019. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Eni vak (speak) 21:57, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]