User talk:Francesca31
May 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from MonaVie. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. XXX antiuser eh? 03:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to MonaVie, you may be blocked from editing. XXX antiuser eh? 03:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to MonaVie, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. XXX antiuser eh? 03:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 03:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Welcome
[edit]Here are some useful links to help you with editing: Hello, Francesca31, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Peter 12:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Changing articles
[edit]To answer your question (sent by email) - removing a large body of information without explanation is regarded as vandalism. If you believe the information to be incorrect it is better to either change it, making sure you quote verifiable, independent, reliable sources to back up those changes, or to discuss the issues on the article's talk page. In this case I note that there were many sources already listed in the section you removed, hence I suggest the second. This is to discuss the issue on the article's talk page, e.g. Talk:MonaVie, before you make the changes. Through discussion with other editors consensuses is reached as to how the article should be written. We also have many policies and guidelines to help with this, see the links I posted above. Also in that message is info on how to get answers to any further questions you may have. Peter 12:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)